this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
434 points (95.2% liked)

Work Reform

11547 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 105 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's right. I'm committed to getting paid and doing what I want.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Right? "Winning" what exactly? Reid Hoffman's trying to be the best at being the most miserable and unfulfilled. The most regrets on his death bed.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Until I have the same unlimited upside as a founder does, I’m committed to work life balance. If you’re a wage employee, there is not point in giving your life to your job.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago

To be fair, he's talking to the founders of startups, not employees. But still, he sounds like an ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 40 points 1 week ago

Fuck this guy. I say we guillotine him as an example to the others.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 34 points 1 week ago

I worked at a couple of startups and every single one was a success with good exit strategies, and we had good work-life balance. His view is factually false.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“The people that think that’s toxic don’t understand the start-up game, and they’re just wrong,” he said. “The game is intense. And by the way, if you don’t do that, eventually, you’re out of a job.

For those who disagree, working at a startup is a choice, Hoffman insisted.

But the reward on the other side is second to none; the 100 or so first employees at LinkedIn don’t need to work anymore, he added. Microsoft purchased the professional networking platform for $26.2 billion in 2016.

That's good for the 100 or so first employees at LinkedIn, but I'm certain that the VAST majority of employees who bust their ass trying to help get a start-up off the ground don't have anywhere near that end result. I'm sure it isn't worth it for 99% of employees of start-ups.

But if you want to take on the challenge, hoping that maybe you'll be one of the lucky ones, go for it, but don't fucking drag a spouse/significant other, or children into that nightmare. If you want to commit your entire life to a start-up, then fucking commit.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what happens when you survey jackpot winners about the value of lottery tickets.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

That's called Survivorship Bias, and it's a fallacy! I would expect nothing less than irrationality from a billionaire that got lucky and thinks his hard work in particular was what got him where he is.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's a fucking lotto. Lucky people always think they're smarter or more hardworking than others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reid Hoffman can wake up at 4:30am and begin the important work of eating my entire arsehole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not everyone hates their family, Reid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Linkedin is a meat market for capitalist labor. It is very anti- worker, pro capitalist douchebaggery. Fuck Linkedin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SSNs4evr@leminal.space 27 points 1 week ago

Says the man who has a maid, a butler, a staff waiting with a coffee and strudel for him at work. Every conference call is set up and waiting on him to start. Everyone is lined up to lick his boots at all time, to ensure the person who's time is "the most valuable" never has to spend an extra second listening to anyone or anything they don't want to. Give me a break.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want to live in a place where life isn’t a game with winner or losers, but a fun experience to share with those you love.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You have been banned from /r/capitalism

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 week ago

Fuck off, Reid.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean that's fine for the guy or gal trying to start up their own business, which is what his talk was about, in the class he was addressing.

This should not apply to the workers though which is what way to many of business owners seem to forget once they start touring s profit and hiring people.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What they forget is that other people aren't going to be as comitted to their business as they themselves are. They're not going to care as much for the simple fact, that if the business takes off, they're not going to earn any of the profits. Why would I work 50 hour weeks like the founder, if I don't stand to actually reap the benefits?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] withabeard@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Excuse me sir, we appear to have a different definition of "winning".

[–] TTH4P@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean he's definitely an asshole for many reasons, but the context is "if you are a start-up entrepreneur"

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, he's still an idiot, and he'll realize it when he dies, if he's lucky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does "winning" mean you ignore family, friends, and self-care to further enrich giant corporations...? Cuz if so, I suggest this dude jump up his own asshole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It's also a good sign you're not mentally ill.

[–] martin4598@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

Looking at him, he may need a bit of work-life balance.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The context is important:

for small businesses and entrepreneurs

https://lemmy.ca/comment/15704649

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] polyamorypagan69@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Kings deserve the Guillotine!

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

this belongs in linkedin lunatics

[–] tino@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude wants to win at work. I win at life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These narcissist CEOs cannot grasp the idea that "life" is employees working for themselves and pursuing their own interests instead of working for others.

What kind of commitment does Reid Hoffman have towards seeing his employees win?

What kind of profit sharing do LinkedIn employees enjoy? What's the salary / compensation disperancy look like between the average employee and the C-Suite executives? What's the medical insurance and parental leave packages look like? What about education reimbursement?

Seriously, who is "winning" in Reid Hoffman's ideal scenario?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago

Fuck this "you can't get anywhere without stepping on everyone else" attitude.

[–] Terrapinjoe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

What a loser

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Cool, he might consider fucking off and dying.

[–] whysofurious@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's our secret Raid, we don't want to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

might want to look at your linkedin site, what it has turned into

[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

This guy reeks of chode energy.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree, it's not winning unless you're crying, exhausted and with barely any more money than any other average folk unable to use it properly hoping for early retirement just before the economic crash leads you to being fired and having nepotism replace you instead!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Fuck this guy and anyone who thinks like him

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

If anything, Linkedin itself is a redflag just from their psychopathic micromanagers lost in their own world thinking everyone owes them something.

[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Winning what, more profits for you instead of me? Get fucked, loser.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

There are many ways to win in life. LinkedIn isn't one of them.

I work to live. I dont live to work.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Maybe if workers actually Won by doing their jobs, this would be even close to approaching accurate.

[–] greenhorn@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

I am not committed to winning

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Exactly the sort of vapid self destructive Corpo-Cap shittery you'd expect out of the LinkedIn cofounder. He's probably like that all the time.

[–] Zomg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I live for me, not for a business.

When I'm old and dying I'll never say "I wish I worked more"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

If you think you're winning because you're a corporate slave in capitalism then actually you're losing at life.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

It’s weird that it’s always losers that are the ones talking about winning.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck winning.

Be the best, climb the ladder

Do it better, higher, faster

I refuse to participate

If I go up it will be slow

I’m bringing everyone I know

Stopping on the sixth or seventh rung

load more comments
view more: next ›