106
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] asg101@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago

There is absolutely no defensible morality in supporting genocide and land theft. Free Palestine!

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

I was worried the DSA would lib out on this. It's a good sign that they stand by anti-imperialism when the rubber hits the road.

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

enemy of my enemy is my friend

well until they rosa us but hey whatever

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago
[-] heartheartbreak@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

Drop a link

Also read Blackshirts and Reds by Michael Parenti

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

social democrats are liberals, only useful fighting fascism then should be immediately gotten rid of

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago

Dsa is more of a big tent of socialist tendencies and succdems, and I think the succdems no longer have a majority coalition on the national committee

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago
[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 15 points 10 months ago

Honestly the few cpusa members I know are really big into electoralism and helping democrats

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's only 4 in my city and at least one of them supports cops lmao

[-] Pavlichenko_Fan_Club@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

Hopefully never. Awful revisionist org.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Social democrats are not that useful for fighting fascism most of the time. They side with capital and therefore the fascists.

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago
[-] Juice@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

Nothing is more liberal than uncritical categorization and condemnation.

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

For every time they were useful there are 3 times where they were harmfuul

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

Hey who was in charge of Germany when the Freikorps was established

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

Lemme guess, is it DSA? It must be DSA

I'm not defending the SPD, that's what is so sad. You can't tell the difference between someone saying that something is complicated and someone saying that something is good.

Its no different than when libs flatten the entire 70 year history of the Soviet Union into "Stalin Bad". Do you think that being ignorant of history and intentionally avoiding independent thought, let alone immanent critique is a virtue? Have you ever even heard of dialectics?

Welcome to the kick party comrade, get yet shots in

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

Are they even good for that? History seems to suggest they aren't

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

Won't read a book but you can't wait to purge me

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What's the general idea of Broue's that's relevant here? I'm not familiar with them

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

Pierre Broue wrote the definitive book on the German revolution. Its kind of a doorstop but the events that surrounded the death of Rosa Luxemburg are not black and white. The Vorwarts siege was led by a mob of radical anarchists that was taken over by police infiltrators, not social democrats. You cant compare the SPD to anything anywhere in the world, the SPD was the most powerful party in Germany, they weren't even remotely comparable to DSA. And Rosa was in the SPD, she believed in the party until she was killed by police. People's entire life was contained in the party, it was incredible. But it got fucked up by power and capital. Just because Ebert was a member of the SPD doesn't make all social democrats Ebert. Well, unless someone want to have an excuse to kill leftists and then I guess any justification will do fine. I'm not even a social democrat but I'm in DSA so fuck me

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago

And Rosa was in the SPD, she believed in the party until she was killed by police.

She split with the party well before she was killed.

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Yes the spartacists split in 1917 and she was killed in 1918

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's interesting. I don't have that kind depth of knowledge about this. I'm not sure what you mean with events surrounding the death of Luxemburg not being "black and white." The SPD was against the KPD in the Spartacist uprising. They chose to side with the fascist in the Freikorps. Seems pretty straightforward in terms of where people stood, but I only have a general understanding.

If you can go more in depth I'd like to know.

I'm not even a social democrat but I'm in DSA so fuck me

I don't think there's a problem with being in DSA. Is there some controversy here I'm not aware of?

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

I was responding to

social democrats are liberals, only useful fighting fascism then should be immediately gotten rid of

The SPD was the party of Karl Marx. They had sports clubs, dances, all kinds of social programs, peoples entire social existence was wrapped up in the party. The Germany of the SPD was the Germany that gave gender affirming care to trans people, and opened the first hospital for trans people anywhere ever in history.

It was the vote for war that triggered the events of the German revolution. The KPD was in the SPD before like 1918 or 1919. Yeah they were social democrats, no they weren't principled. This was the party of Karl Kautsky as well. There were inherent contradictions, which people would realize if they took a critical view of actual history instead of repeating whatever some fed YouTuber says about it. Its the black and white uncritical view that is the mark of an online commie cosplayer.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

I don't disagree the the SPD has an interesting and important history. But they did oppose the KPD and could not stop the later rise of fascism which is also part of their history. So i can also understand and don't disagree being highly critical of the SPD and Social Democracy more generally.

Thanks for the book recommendation, I'd like to learn more about that period and the SPD, and why the German Revolution failed.

if they took a critical view of actual history instead of repeating whatever some fed YouTuber says about it. Its the black and white uncritical view that is the mark of an online commie cosplayer.

I'm not sure what the hostility is about or toward. I mean fuck Breadtube and all, no one should take that seriously. But I don't think its that weird for communists to have a critical view of social democrats. I mean was Stalin a cosplayer when he said social democracy was objectively the left wing of fascism?

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

No its fine to criticize the SPD, as it is worthy of criticism. It is not principled however to lump DSA, which is full of many principled, dedicated communists in with the right wing of the SPD. I don't care about critiques of the SPD, I have no horse in that race. What I do care about is people with no actual understanding of what led to the death of Rosa Luxemburg, what caused the split with the SPD in the first place, just shunting us into the same category as the cops that murdered Rosa and Karl.

Germany was the most advanced industrial society of the time, and they had developed the most progressive working class. It had inherent contradictions that came to bear in 1917 when the SPD voted to fund the war. I want comrades to understand those contradictions so we can take those lessons and cautionary tales into our organizing. Instead I think people just want to look cool in front of other commies on the internet by repeating ahistorical garbage that collapses historic struggle into stark, discreet categories.

For example, Rosa and Karl Liebknecht knew the path the SPD was on, they knew the leadership was fat and happy on the top of the government all the way back in 1914. But they weren't prepared for the split in 1917. Why? Why didn't they prepare more, agitate more, connect more with the working class, build the power of the Spartacist league? Their failure to prepare for the catastrophe of the 1917 vote is one of many missed opportunities from that time.

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wrt Stalin he was pushing a political line based on his objective conditions, which he understood. And still he made a lot of mistakes. But at least he engaged in critique. What you just said isn't critique its a quote. Meaningless out of context, except as a shibboleth

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

I mean was Stalin a cosplayer when he said social democracy was objectively the left wing of fascism?

smh this guy doesn't know Stalin watched youtube smh

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

you're not reactionary for being a marxist trying to work within a social democrat party- wait

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

fae said "drop a link" and i don't see a link

[-] Juice@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

If you have some patience and good faith, then your IRL organizing will go.much smoother I promise! https://www.marxists.org/archive/broue/1975/germrev/index.html

[-] Kaplya@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

Serious question here: how?

Do you have an actual strategy to defeat imperialism at home and stop the genocide in Gaza beyond releasing statements?

The article addresses none of the potential practical solutions but instead focused on addressing Isserman’s accusations and raising awareness about the Palestinian issues.

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

Long time lurker, first time poster here. I'm working on proposals for my local DSA chapters. What do you WANT us to do? I want to do what we can provided we can keep our members safe. At the same time I'm not interested in running yet another book club. I want to make some sort of material impact...

Ideas:

  • printing off stickers to slap on Sabra containers "this product supports genocide"
  • looking up Zionist supporters, MIC ghouls or other people of interest in the area and carrying out a protest at their homes. I don't believe general marches do anything, but targeted ones could be effective?
[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago
  • Doing this: https://hexbear.net/post/956137
  • Research businesses in the area that fund Israel or do business with Israel. Create information campaign "this business supports genocide"

What else could we do?

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
106 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22190 readers
180 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS