this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
292 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22263 readers
302 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] axont@hexbear.net 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think this is that one survey from 2016. If I remember right it only asked for reactions to certain words, positive or negative. Whenever I see similar polls it makes me consider the average American doesn't see the terms capitalism and socialism like we do. The average person sees these as character traits, not movements or distinct economic structures. Capitalist simply means greedy businessman, nothing structural. Socialism is high taxes and government doing stuff.

There's not a lot of coherent public discourse about this.

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of Americans who own ZERO capital consider themselves ideological capitalists. This isn't an impossible stance. I wouldn't even say it's a hypocritical one. But it is absolutely a moronic stance born from ignorance basically like you laid out above. I'd only argue with you that a lot do not even think of it as greedy. They conflate capitalism with "freedom" and socialism with "not freedom." And that happens because of the past 100 years+ of red scare bullshit.

[–] LGOrcStreetSamurai@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whenever I see similar polls it makes me consider the average American doesn't see the terms capitalism and socialism like we do. The average person sees these as character traits, not movements or distinct economic structures. Capitalist simply means greedy businessman, nothing structural. Socialism is high taxes and government doing stuff.

I would very much agree with your assessment. I think the public discourse has failed to get the idea of structural thought into these words. It's really sad to me that while most people would totally be onboard with socialism and communism but lack the language to even understand what they actually are. I always feel like you have describe Socialism in these very obtuse ways to obfuscate what it's called to get average Americans onboard. As soon as you call it what it is, they bug out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago (10 children)

and about 92% of them are NATO leftists who hate every AES country and think people like Vaush sound intelligent.

[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you're cutting yourself off at the knees if you assume that. Obviously I doubt the majority are theory-hardened communists, but this obviously represents a popular swell of public opinion despite our inability to act so far on anything as "the left" in the US

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how many of the revolutionary proletarians during the rise of communism knew their shit. Not many I guess, but they had people they followed that did, like Lenin, even if they didn't completely understand the theory or fully agreed with it.

Then again people back then didn't have a century of propaganda to deal with..

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's pretty obvious almost none of them. The Chinese civil war picked up millions of conrades along the way and there is absolutely 0 chance most, or even a significant portion of them spent weeks or months cramming a bunch of theory in their free time while working for their feudal/war lords before defecting

A lot of them just heard that the communists were promising them their own land, guaranteed nourishment for their entire family, and how much better their followers were being treated

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hexbear stop overestimating Vaush's influence challenge (impossible).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (20 children)

come on, you know that's not true

[–] Kaplya@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I love talking politics with people and I have talked to A LOT of libs. Most agree that we need to tax the corporations more, the capitalists have gotten too greedy, we should spend more of the defense budget on healthcare, infrastructure etc.

Not a single one of them thinks that revolution should be anywhere on the table. And when some of them finally admit that China is doing something good, it’s only because China is not socialist, it is a capitalist country! That’s why it is able to raise the living standards of its people because they have adopted some of our capitalist policies! But unlike us, they’re totalitarians!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] YourFavoriteFed@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago

Hmmm, after spending their formative years with the boomer generation constantly rubbing their lucky breaks in our faces. Smug corpos laughing at us for being arbitrarily told we're unemployable....it truly is a mystery where the resentment comes from...

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The lack of trust in the capitalist system is Harvard Business School’s biggest challenge, according to Dean Nitin Nohria[5]. The Business School has always been closely associated with broader trends in the business world, and it must work toward reassuring society that businesses and the capitalist system are productive. The school has taken several actions in an effort to answer that question, including introducing more courses focused on ideas about economic structure. The school is trying to find ways to engage students in conversations about capitalism and its flaws. The school has a second-year course called ‘Reimagining Capitalism’ that has become one of its most successful second-year electives. The school is also trying to bring that material back into the first year of its MBA curriculum.

Lol of course.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

Only a business school grad could think the people who sign up to go to business school are the ones you need to sell capitalism to

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, well, since we live in a democracy that should be the end of the matter, then, shouldn't it? Shouldn't it?

[–] muddi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I remember in school when we had US history for the sixth time for social studies class, they taught us again about the early debates in the Federalist Papers on how the baby democracy might turn into a monster by allowing the majority to win votes somehow

Obviously it's better to have a tyranny of the minority than the tyranny of the majority, some dead guy in a wig said so

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm amazed that 49% support it.

In 1960 US minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the cost of the average house was $11,000.00* A high school grad could move out and be self supporting instantly.

*Unless you're ready to prove that inflation is the reason houses today are larger and have things like air conditioning, don't tell me that modern houses are 'better.'

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A lot of older houses also had better passive cooling and more design consideration towards the environment (facing where prevailing winds come from, having wind funnels, chimneys that expel heat from the house, large cool basements that people would move into during the summer, not chopping down all trees within 3 miles)

I’m sure to some extent this is also survivorship bias but having lived in homes and apartments both 10-30 years old and 80-100+ years old, the old ones have all been way better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] duderium@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is cool but there's still a big leap to be taken between disliking capitalism and actually advocating for communism. A year or two ago a friend of mine admitted that capitalism is fucked, but he couldn't bring himself to support communism because he thinks that communism basically means universal concentration camps. "You get a concentration camp! And you get a concentration camp!" It's common enough for people to admit that things are fucked up, but their solution usually revolves around electing good capitalist puppets to replace the bad capitalist puppets, and/or to do some kind of genocide against minorities who have nothing to do with societal problems. Plenty of these respondents probably believe that something like "crony capitalism" is at fault and that we need to go back to the good old days when a man could get ahead if he worked hard (i.e., during the enclosures).

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

There is a particular irony about the proletarian from the country with the highest prisoner population per capita (probably of all time) thinking that 'communism' means 'concentration camps'.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wordplay@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm in a town where basic shelter is unaffordable and constantly features puff pieces about the plights of our landlords, and the local subreddit has the majority of locals calling landlords parasites. All that's missing is a vanguard that can organize and guide this sentiment.

[–] bigboopballs@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

the local subreddit has the majority of locals calling landlords parasites.

That's pretty rare. Most local subreddits are inhabited by landlords and landlord sympathizers.

[–] cleoburymortimer@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

why not start a tenant union? we founded one last year in my city from nothing, one guy organised a public meeting and advertised it on facebook/eventbrite and a few ppl came along, now we're a year old and growing fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I just wanna see a poll going over the percentage of outright communists someday (although tbh it would probably also have a selection for fascist that would have twice the percentage jokerfication)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The cynic in me reads this as ~48% of youths want more libraries, but would still froth as hard as any boomer if you suggest union busting is wrong, or something cool like we should nationalize Amazon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Finger@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no more half measures walter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flinch@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna BLOOOOOOOM bloomer

[–] Pluto@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

This is a biased study.

A lot more don't support it.

[–] YourFavoriteFed@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Let me guess, a good 80% of them want nazism as the alternative. Don't they?

load more comments
view more: next ›