this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
164 points (100.0% liked)

news

23545 readers
872 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Huawei and SMIC quietly rolled out a new Kirin 9000C processor.

Chinese foundry SMIC may have broken the 5nm process barrier, as evidenced by a new Huawei laptop listed with an advanced chip with 5nm manufacturing tech — a feat previously thought impossible due to U.S sanctions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 106 points 11 months ago (2 children)

...Do you guys think this sudden Chinese ability to manufacture technology might have something to do with the entire Western World spending three or four decades outsourcing the manufacturing of every single kind of technology to China specifically because it was cheap? No, no, I realize that I sound crazy when I say that.

[–] riseuppikmin@hexbear.net 72 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The countries being outsourced to aren't supposed to actually learn how to make the thing Brandon please you gotta stop this

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The funniest part is that this is a trick that Lenin openly discussed in public speeches in the early years of the Soviet Union.

[–] IceWallowCum@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Can you point me towards some of them?

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Probably the "the capitalists will sell us the rope we hang them with"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] davel@hexbear.net 58 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the manufacturing can’t be brought back home, because the domestic costs of production have skyrocketed thanks to the financialization of everything in the interim period.

[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 55 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also because manufacturing takes a lot of skill, and so much of it has been outsourced for so long that the Western world simply lacks the infrastructure to be able to do it. And infrastructure in this case doesn't just mean equipment. Equipment could be procured quickly. It a also means a population with the relevant education for and, above all, experience with working in large scale manufacturing of complicated products.

Once upon a time "Made in China" really did mean that something was of dubious quality. Back when they started putting all the manufacturing in China simply because it was cheap and China was still getting to grips with how to do this large scale manufacturing with no experience and a severe lack of people educated in how it worked. Two or three generations later and that is no longer the case. Unsurprisingly, people raised and educated from birth in the world's largest manufacturer of goods are kind of good at making stuff. But moving production back would mean more than just building factories and machines. It would mean accepting that two or so decades long period where you are just learning how to make stuff in the 21st century.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Exactly. Not only the infrastructure, but also the expertise for it. You can't build on the knowledge of hundreds of engineers with decades of expertise in a subject without having the facilities. Especially with the new crop of engineers, 70% of whom are coming out of school basically running everything through Chat GPT and not actually understanding how anything works, setting them years behind their international competition. It's not even their fault though, only the top 5% of engineering schools get any kind of real funding, everything else is expected to get additional funding through endowments, which means even STEM curriculum gets massively underfunded to what it would take to actually industrialize the nation intellectually, which is what we would need since we do not have the labor based to support that. There is literally only one school in the U.S. that does a masters or doctorate program in manufacturing engineering for welding. One. For the whole country. There are only a few schools in the U.S. that offer plastics engineering, or even generalized manufacturing engineering.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Judge_Juche@hexbear.net 99 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

This stuff always reminds me of China's nuclear program in the 60s. Like once the Sino-Soviet Split happened the US literally just assumed that Chinese people were too stupid to produce an atomic bomb. Even after China's first nuclear test in '64 the US would not recognize them as a nuclear power, and kept insisting they would be unable to develop nuclear armed ballistic missiles or thermonuclear weapons, both of which were then tested in the next two years and both times it was deeply shocking to the US foreign policy blob.

Also, the US went on to learning nothing from this becuase the exact same thing happened with North Korea which went from their first nuclear test to thermonuclear weapons in 10 years. Like in the early stages North Korea was very willing to surrender their nuclear weapons program for lifting of sanctions, but the US would never negotiate in good faith becuase they genuinely believed the North Koreans were to primitive to proceed to the next stage of development.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 64 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Nooooo you yellows can't just... Invent things. You're supposed to be good at rote math but not creative like ussssss!"

[–] StellarTabi@hexbear.net 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

rage-cry how could you possibly create nuclear ICBMs without a profit incentive!!!

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Turns out the thought of being able to reduce the KKKrakas to radioactive dust is a very powerful incentive for most people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

American racism will continue to be their biggest downfall

[–] Monsieur_bleu@hexbear.net 40 points 11 months ago

The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies..... However, the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy

[–] D61@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago

lathe-of-heaven "We keep trying to use the lathe... but it just isn't working!"

[–] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 82 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I just read an article about how the only reason they got to 7nm was because they were abusing their less advanced methods by being willing to make a ton of faulty chips for every good one, and that it was incredibly inefficient and only feasible because of STATE INTERVENTION which is a free-market cheat code. Basically the human-wave attack propaganda but for microprocessors, lol.

Seems like they figured some things out on their own.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 59 points 11 months ago

They can’t imagine a mode of production centered on actually producing things instead of just making money.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I just read an article about how the only reason they got to 7nm was because they were abusing their less advanced methods by being willing to make a ton of faulty chips for every good one

So… research and development?

[–] Darth_Reagan@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago

Complaining that chemists don't make a new chemical perfectly on the first try

[–] Hexbollah@hexbear.net 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You always have low yield when developing new processes. You can't make a 7nm process by just running 14nm at high throughput/low yield. This is just R&D and process development.

[–] StellarTabi@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago

The fact they didn't do it perfectly and better on their first try is because their ideology told them not to.

[–] macerated_baby_presidents@hexbear.net 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

lol. everyone knows that US processor production is lossy too. They just turn off the buggy sectors and sell it as an i5 instead of an i7 or whatever.

[–] TheCaconym@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago

Exactly right; IIRC just how many of the produced chips are actually functional is systematically kept secret by manufacturers, too, but there are a lot of duds.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago

Basically the human-wave attack propaganda but for microprocessors, lol.

The one ~~with the rifle~~ shoots. The ~~one without~~ zero follows. When the one ~~with the rifle~~ is killed, the ~~one following~~ zero ~~picks up the rifle and~~ shoots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 80 points 11 months ago (1 children)

feat previously thought impossible

our geopolitical foes aren't inherently dumber than us :0

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

Quite the opposite

[–] Mokey@hexbear.net 63 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Its going to be fake and not real and also stolem because its china

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 11 months ago

Damn, you summerised every comment I've seen about it in 2 lines. You're talented.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 61 points 11 months ago

US sanctions failed again? surprised-pika

[–] Swoosegoose@hexbear.net 54 points 11 months ago

"defying U.S. sanctions" the most beautiful combination of three words you will ever hear

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

defying U.S. sanctions

because the US tried to stop a chinese company from doing business with anothe chinese company lol

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

Huawei: "I consent"

SMIC: "I consent"

CIA: "WAS THERE SOMEBODY YOU FORGOT TO ASK?"

[–] edge@hexbear.net 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)

“7 nm”, “5 nm”, etc are all lies at this point. They mean nothing, just marketing terms. Nothing actually measures 5 nm. Idk what they’re doing to make the processors better, but it’s not shrinking the transistors as the name implies.

And since it’s a marketing term, there’s no objective way to measure it.

The term "5 nm" has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors being 5 nanometers in size. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a "5 nm node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 51 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 30 nanometers". However, in real world commercial practice, "5 nm" is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption compared to the previous 7 nm process.

Apple markets their latest processors as “3 nm”.

[–] Hexbollah@hexbear.net 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I haven't really dived into the IEEE standards here, but this is a real thing and not purely marketing. It is the resolution of the lithography. Due to the higher clock speeds and current resolutions, the capacitance and inductance of the elements set the size of transistors and routing, rather than just how small you can pattern them. So it is not directly increasing transistor density and processing power, but it means that you are patterning elements more accurately to what you designed and have less variation element to element. Meaning that things can be optimized and more consistent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's amazing how willing the US government is to do this, it would be very rough for the national governments if they just banned the import of these things in order to develop their own productive capacity. Xi and Putin should send Biden thank-you cards for helping them out so much.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even Kissinger saw this coming.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago

It's really hilarious how much the old ghouls who were part of the creation of this new world order are aware that the absolute midwit shitbirds running the show today are tearing it down without meaning to. Mearsheimer is similar in being a real ghoul who can tell the dummies in charge now are doing imperialism wrong, and I get great enjoyment out of it.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 37 points 11 months ago

Turns out if you offer capitalists money for something they will take it

[–] davel@hexbear.net 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Kinda want to get my hands on a Huawei Qingyun L540 laptop now, but they’re not available to backwater markets like Burgerland.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago

You can import them, but I don’t know if the US has banned carriers for working with Chinese phones. I know a lot of dumb phones don’t work in the US because they’re blocked

[–] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago

SMIC flexing on Intel now. Love to see it

[–] StellarTabi@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here's to hoping my next laptop is a native Linux one. critical-support

[–] Zvyozdochka@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

You can already buy laptops & tablets that come w/ Linux pre-installed & have open-source firmware.

StarLabs and System76 being a couple I know off the top of my head

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] xXthrowawayXx@hexbear.net 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

5nm is a very small penis.

[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

When it gets cold out the electrons start to tunnel

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

Just wait until the huge chip factory powered by a particle accelerator comes online.

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago
[–] bigboopballs@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I was saying just the other day in another thread here that 5nm would be cracked by next year then it's a 5 or so year catch up to the final hurdles.

The optimist in me thinks 2 or 3 years before they crack 3nm and another 2 or 3 for 2nm. 6 years and they'll be on top with a manufacturing scale that is impossible for anyone else to replicate to be competitive with what they can produce.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›