408
submitted 8 months ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 240 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

How about we go back to the one where we applied a marginal tax rate of 90% to the rich?

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 188 points 8 months ago

And 30+% union membership

And houses that cost 4x median income

And shooting Nazis

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago

Y'all are describing my wet dreams. Keep going!

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 15 points 8 months ago

How can you be so cruel? Those poor widdle Nazis have feelings too, you know?

[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Mmmm, nice dream

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

The modern rich are only rich on paper and in stock. For the rest they have debts that borrow against their stocks meaning they are still taxed at 0. This needs to be adressed as well then. Maybe by counting the cash out of such loans as realized gains or something.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

tax on unrealized gains based on the tax year those gains happen, same with losses.

Big win one year? awesome! pay taxes!

big loss next year? bummer! no taxes if you only lost money... but no carrying that shit over.

Imagine all that money which would have FLOODED the economy post-covid while people were poor as shit that would have wiped out the national debt which in no small part was from handouts to the 'welfare kings' with businesses that pocketed tons of free cash from dumpy's bailouts in covid times. Full circle could have been nice.

Instead we just get f'd.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 128 points 8 months ago

The monkey's paw curls. Mark Robinson is transported back to the year 1900. Women can't vote. He is then promptly arrested and imprisoned for the crime of being a colored man in a whites-only establishment.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

True, Mark would face lots of racism back then.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 78 points 8 months ago

I sometimes think that the GOP is going out of their way to field the most bat-shit crazy field of candidates at all levels just to make Trump look sane by comparison.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

Nah they're voters are just that mentally unfit and fascist.

[-] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 8 months ago

Nah, the voters at best are uneducated and bandwagoners led by cheap group emotional manipulation (which is much easier to do to someone lacking an education)

Remember everyone, we've gotta live with these people after Trump and Biden go to live on the farm. We don't have the numbers to simplistically oppress them (wouldn't work for long if we did), or the desire to wipe them out (which, why would we want to become them). So we better start prepping ourselves for continuing life as equal citizens with people who voted for Trump.

(Especially if we're ever gonna get enough people on board with turning against actual ruiling class UwU)

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

It’s a thought. And I’m happy to engage once they admit out loud that they were wrong to support a demented rapist fraud for president who was clearly incompetent. And, who tried to overthrow democracy.

Say that, and we’re back to talking again. Don’t and, well, lolno.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sorry, but bad people are bad. It doesn't matter how stupid they are if they're already making life worse for others for stupid reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Trump is too preoccupied with grifting to say all this crazy shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Could be. Wouldn't surprise me. Also possible the grifters are being replaced with true believers.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

Ironically, aren't those the days where lynching was legal? Man, we have thee dumbest politicians.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 51 points 8 months ago

My wife literally said, "He gets to lose his rights first. Then we will talk."

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 21 points 8 months ago

*most craven

He's probably making 6 figures by saying these things. A lot of people decide to sell out their social grouping for hard cash, this Uncle Ruckus motherfucker is just doing it in public and in a little more blatant / attention grabbing fashion than usual.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I've read this guy also says African Americans should pay reparations to whites for bringing them to the Americas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

Fuck I hate having to defend these assholes but if we're going to call them out on their bullshit it needs to be accurate. The quote is slightly taken out of context because he was inexplicably trying to dodge a question that wasn't presented to him.

He is IMO trying to say I want to go back to the period of time when women couldn't vote because back then people actually fought for those rights. That's a dumbass circular argument but I don't think he is actually saying he thinks women shouldn't vote.

Hang the things they actually mean to say around their neck, not stupid slips of the tongue.

All that said - fuck this guy and fuck Huffington post for their shitty articles.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago

Fuck I hate having to defend these assholes but if we’re going to call them out on their bullshit it needs to be accurate. The quote is slightly taken out of context because he was inexplicably trying to dodge a question that wasn’t presented to him.

Take a look at the rest of the stuff he's been known for saying. From the article:

  • “The only thing worse than a woman who doesn’t know her place, is a man who doesn’t know his,” he wrote on Facebook in December 2017.
  • He also wrote, “I am REALLY sick of feminism and feminist. They are just as bad, if not worse, than racist.”
  • There’s plenty more to revisit with Robinson’s attacks on women, including calling them “whores,” “witches” and “rejected drag queens.”
  • There’s also his record of quoting Adolf Hitler, fanning Islamophobia, saying trans people should be arrested for using bathrooms, casting doubts on the Holocaust and spreading countless dangerous conspiracy theories.

Sure, he was trying to dodge a "gotcha" question, but his answer falls right in line with what he's been saying for years anyway. His statement is completely in line with his other stated beliefs.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 14 points 8 months ago

"The only thing worse than a woman who doesn’t know her place, is a man who doesn’t know his,” he wrote on Facebook in December 2017.

Perhaps I need to get my eyes checked, but.. Isn't he black? I shudder to think what a black man "knowing his place" in NC meant just a handful of years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

Isnt that around the same time black people were not allowed to do uuhhh well anything? Bit weird

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 26 points 8 months ago

Better yet:

SOMEONE QUICK RETURN THIS MAN TO HIS OWNER.

See? Ya sound like a fuckin dick when ya say shit like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] evergreen@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I wonder how he'd feel about walking it back further, to a time when black men also could not vote. Or maybe to a time when all blacks in this country were considered farm equipment. He sure likes to talk about how various groups of people should "know their place".

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

No, no, you see he has to be at the top so he can pull the ladder up behind him. That’s the whole point of being a Republican! You can’t make him go back to him being at the bottom with the poors and the women and, God forbid, the gays!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

Mark, I don't think you want to do that as a black man.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 8 months ago

Also, there wasn't any Internet service.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago

Bizarre? Republicans have been whining about women's suffrage for a long time now.

When women got the right to vote is when it all went down hill

-Rush Limbaugh, 2012

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 38 points 8 months ago

And people wonder why we call him Uncle Ruckus.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

There's nothing bizarre about this you bunch of shitty ass journalists. This type of bullshit has always been part and parcel of the Republican party.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

I've seen other clips of him. He is evil and anti-black with self-hate issues. The ideal GOP guy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GoddessOfGouda@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Careful how far back you go, buddy…….

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Buddy some want to go back to a time you couldn't either.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

Robinson said he would definitely return to the days in America when women were denied the right to vote “because in those days we had people who fought for real social change, and they were called Republicans.”

Yes, because that was before the Republican party became enshittified by Goldwater’s Southern Strategy. Those same people who fought for social change back then would be Democrats now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

He just needs a ponytail n a salmon shirt n hell straight up be uncle Ruckus.

No relation

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

I wonder what his wife and other female relatives think of him.

[-] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

I've had female relatives mad when the churches they attended started letting women vote in church matters. So I'm guessing about like that. Self hate is such a warm little cocoon once you cut off the parts of yourself that it demands.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

He's black? Omg this guy can't see beyond his nose.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

“because in those days we had people who fought for real social change, and they were called Republicans.”

This room full of women was quiet as he spoke, though a faint “That’s right” could be heard when Robinson later said Republicans ended Jim Crow laws.

There's a non-outrage-inducing non-headline grabbing logic here that is him saying he wishes republicans were more liberal

It's very different from saying "I don't think women should be allowed to vote"

If the masses can't distinguish between these two concepts (they certainly cannot) then it is what it is. Pillory the guy, I don't give an F, I wouldn't have voted a republican in to a leadership position anyway due to the party's policies and issues that are systemic.

[-] Betch@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

“If blacks should stand up against racism, and women should stand up against sexism....shouldn’t men stand up against feminism?” he posted on Sept. 20, 2016.

That same day, he also wrote, “I am REALLY sick of feminism and feminist. They are just as bad, if not worse, than racist.”

There’s plenty more to revisit with Robinson’s attacks on women, including calling them “whores,” “witches” and “rejected drag queens.” There’s also his record of quoting Adolf Hitler, fanning Islamophobia, saying trans people should be arrested for using bathrooms, casting doubts on the Holocaust and spreading countless dangerous conspiracy theories.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

I think the women of North Carolina should oblige him by specifically not voting…for him. Only him though.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
408 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4771 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS