1575
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 794 points 2 months ago

Then it sounds like your business is a failure and should be shutdown.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 176 points 2 months ago

WHO is the one guy who downvotes you???

"NO! UNPROFITABLE BUSINESSES DESERVE TO THRIVE!!! MUST FEED THE BILLIONAIRES!!!"

Maybe OpenAI learned to downvote...

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 114 points 2 months ago

I've seen threads where every single comment, no matter how anodyne, has 1 downvote. Don't bother yourself over it. That way lies madness.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Downvoting for the use of an uncommon word.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 months ago

anodyne

anodyne /ăn′ə-dīn″/ adjective

  1. Capable of soothing or eliminating pain.
  2. Relaxing. "anodyne novels about country life."
  3. Serving to assuage pain; soothing.

tanks fer noo werd dae fren

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 337 points 2 months ago
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 151 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly this meme is way understating the sinisterness

  • Election interference for money machine
  • Whole internet is ads company
  • Dopamine addiction for all children
  • Superpowers for law enforcement
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 256 points 2 months ago

Yeah! I can't make money running my restaurant if I have to pay for the ingredients, so I should be allowed to steal them. How else can I make money??

Alternatively:

OpenAI is no different from pirate streaming sites in this regard (loosely: streaming sites are way more useful to humanity). If OpenAI gets a pass, so should every site that's been shut down for piracy.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 111 points 2 months ago

If OpenAI wants a pass, then just like how piracy services make content freely open and available, they should make their models open.

Give me the weights, publish your datasets, slap on a permissive license.

If you're not willing to contribute back to society with what you used from it, then you shouldn't exist within society until you do so.

[-] CrayonMaster@midwest.social 58 points 2 months ago

Piracy steals from the rich and gives to the poor. ChatGPT steals from the rich and the poor and keeps for itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 194 points 2 months ago

In every other circumstance I can think of, “I can’t make money doing a thing unless I break the law” means don’t do that thing.

Why should AI get special treatment?

[-] Nurgle@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

Well in almost every other circumstance, you’re forgetting Uber and Airbnb.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 147 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Cool. If OpenAI gets a pass, then piracy should be legal, right? I mean what good is a trademark or copyright law?

Edit: "I can't make money without stealing other people's work" is definitely a take

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

No, see, piracy is just you downloading movies for yourself. To be like OpenAI you need to download it, put it in a pretty package with a bow, then sell it over and over again. Only when it’s piracy for profit do you get to beg and plead for a pass.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 139 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

then perish

If I was exempt from copyright, I too could easily make oodles of money

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teft@lemmy.world 129 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sounds like an argument slave owners would use. "My plantation can't make money without free labor!"

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 102 points 2 months ago

I'm going to start pirating again and if I ever get caught up I'll just inform them I'm training AI models.

[-] whyalone@lemm.ee 47 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but you are not rich, so you will suffer the consequences

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 88 points 1 month ago

I can't make money without using OpenAI's paid products for free.

Checkmate motherfucker

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 85 points 1 month ago

If your company can't exist without breaking the law, then it shouldn't exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago

Boo fucking hoo. Everyone else has to make licensing agreements for this kind of shit, pay up.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago

"Limiting training data to public domain books and drawings created more than a century ago might yield an interesting experiment, but would not provide AI systems that meet the needs of today's citizens."

exactly which “needs” are they trying to meet?

[-] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 month ago

shareholders' needs, like greater valuation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If a company cannot do business without breaking the law it simply is a criminal organisation. RICO act, anyone?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 74 points 1 month ago

Then OpenAI shouldn’t exist. That’s capitalism.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago

Hey, me either. I guess I can steal too.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 71 points 1 month ago

But if you're the Internet Archive, fuck you its lawsuit time. I hate this cyberpunk present.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You wouldn't download a collection of all the art and knowledge ever documented in the entire history of the known universe...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 67 points 2 months ago

"WE'RE NOT A VIABLE BUSINESS! BWAH!"

Oh. Oh no. Such a shame.

[-] Rodrios@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago

Honestly, that sounds like a You problem, Sam.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago

oh good. then fuck off. who knew copyright law would eventually be the good guy in a story.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

It is impossible for my turnip soup business to make money if you enforce laws that make it illegal for me to steal turnips.

Paying for turnips is not realistic.

You bureaucrats don't understand food.

@davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 57 points 1 month ago

I could make a lot of money too if I could use copyrighted shit for free.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago

Some idea for others: If OpenAI wins, then use this case when you get busted for sellling bootleg Blu-Rays (since DVDs are long obsolete) from your truck.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] bappity@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago

"waaaaah please give us exemption so we can profit off of stolen works waaaaaaaahhhhhh"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 2 months ago

I stand by my opinion that learning systems training on copyrighted materials isn't the problem, it's companies super eager to replace human workers with automation (or replace skilled workers with cheaper, unskilled workers). The problem is, every worker not working is another adult (and maybe some kids) not eating and not paying rent.

(And for those of you soulless capitalists out there, people without food and shelter is bad. That's a thing we won't tolerate and start looking at you lean-and-hungry-like when it happens. That's what gets us thinking about guillotines hungry for aristocrats.)

In my ideal world, everyone would have food, shelter, clothes, entertainment and a general middle-class lifestyle whether they worked or not, and intellectual-property temporary monopolies would be very short and we'd have a huge public domain. I think the UN wants to be on the same page as me, but the United States and billionaires do not.

All we'd have to worry about is the power demands of AI and cryptomining, which might motivate us to get pure-hydrogen fusion working. Or just keep developing solar, wind, geothermal and tidal power until everyone can run their AC and supercomputer.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

Bet they get the pass that the Internet Archive didn't.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

So say the operators of piracy websites. I'm in favor of media piracy being legalized.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thurstylark@lemm.ee 48 points 2 months ago

Oh, poor baby can't make money with an illegal business model. How awful.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

So... they are a non-profit (as they initially were) or a public research lab then. That would perfectly fine to say the path that they chose and so happen to make them unbelievably rich, is not viable.

They don't have a business if they can't legally make profit, it's not that hard. I'm sure people who are pursing superhuman intelligence can figure out that much, if not they can ask their "AI" some help to understand.

What a joke.

[-] 5paceThunder@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 months ago

If openai gets to use copyrighted content for free, then so should every one else.

If that happens, no point making anything, since your stuff will get stolen anyway

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 month ago

They already stole my work. No respect.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

He has committed the greatest crime imaginable! A crime against capitalism!

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 38 points 2 months ago
[-] subtext@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

Written January of this year

JAN 8, 2:29 PM EST

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deltreed@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don’t mind him using copyrighted materials as long as it leads to OpenAI becoming truly open source. Humans can replicate anything found in the wild with minor variations, so AI should have the same access. This is how human creativity builds upon itself. Why limit AI? We already know all the jobs people have will be replaced anyway eventually.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Even I should get a pass to view copyrighted movies and songs. I need it to train AI (Actual Intelligence).

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
1575 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59054 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS