501

Ticket of absolute idiots.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 253 points 1 month ago

it hurt itself in its confusion!

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 148 points 1 month ago

He says as the running mate of a billionaire celebrity that’s trying to influence people.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 100 points 1 month ago

Don't you mean, "billionaire" celebrity?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 26 points 1 month ago
[-] freebread@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, he hosted on Celebrity Apprentice.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago

Didn't make him a celebrity.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

He said Trump wasn't either a billionaire, celebrity, or both., could be any one of the options really. Someone should ask him to clarify so he can stick his foot in his mouth again.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Well we know he’s not a billionaire, and we know he’s a celebrity

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 135 points 1 month ago

Sen. J.D. Vance knows Americans can't be influenced by a billionaire celebrity with little interest in the day-to-day problems they face.

But a pretend billionaire who was mildly famous as a joke decades ago?

That's JD's pick?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

No no Trump's not influencing them, he's ruling them.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Or maybe he means the space billionaire who sends rape threats to another billionaire 20 years younger than him?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So he'll stop cashing those checks from Peter Thiel then?

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

BWAHAHAHAHA

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

Maybe this is his way of saying Trump is broke?

Heterosectional says what?

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Take that Leon

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

JD Vance is a Zack Galifianakis character.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

He's leaving money on the table here

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago

To be fair Trump isn't a billionaire

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago

Irony, thy name is Vance.

[-] BillMurray@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 19 points 1 month ago

Only when he says it.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well. Technically. They artificially inflated the value of truth social or whatever that ticker is.

He’s got enough shares it could fall to 1 dollar and he’d still make bank.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 month ago

Vance needs to get a nice sofa in a secluded spot and let this whole thing blow over.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Can VPs drop out even if they want to? I don’t think you can after a certain date. You can do a Shermanesque declaration and resign but the office would still be yours if you ran, declared you were dropping out, then won

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 5 points 1 month ago

I’m pretty sure you can say “fuck this place” at any stage of the game.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I assume that since the deadline has past for some states, Vance has to be on the ballot, even if he drops out. Trump has to carry him to term (pun intended). For example, RFK Jr. dropped out, but will still be on the ballot.

If these terrible people are elected and do not take the oath of office, then presumably the 25th amendment takes effect, and a new VP is appointed by the president, or the VP elect ascends to President if the presidency is vacant.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Vance and a sofa. He'd be the one to blow first.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

Hopefully at least the sofa wears protection. Don't want stains.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Scotchgard FTW.

I wonder if Vance has shares in 3M. Seems like given his predilections, that would be a smart idea. But being smart clearly isn't one of his strengths.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I love that photo. He has a face that says "I can feel some of my neurons trying to connect together, but they keep missing so I don't know what they're saying."

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I would not want to be on the bad side of Taylor Swift. She holds grudges and puts in the work to obliterate people in her way. She has the money and following to make a real difference.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Do you have examples of this or is it just hyperbole?

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Her post has sent over 300k people to vote.gov within 24 hours. Does that work for you?

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Not really, that’s not a grudge. I was hoping for example not related to the election.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I thought you were looking for examples of her having lots of following and money, which seemed like a strange thing to have to prove.

For grudges, I think her rule is that she doesn’t hold one, “per se”, and rises above it. I do remember an incident with somebody (want to say Kanye) at an awards show and the way in which I remember her handling it was to let her class and fans speak out for her without having to use her mouth to cut someone down.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The OP claimed she “obliterates” people she holds grudges against. I’d never heard any stories about her like that and still haven’t. Didn’t know if I missed something, I don’t follow career.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The guy who owned the rights to her first six albums was being a bully and asshole to her, so she has been re-recording all of those albums one by one from scratch and telling her fans to buy those instead so he won’t profit off her work. She’s done like 4 already.

[-] Heikki@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

To be fair. Trump may not actually be a billionaire on paper, only thoughts.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

His comment insists upon itself.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Ignoring reality has always been a risky business.

But what can one expect from someone who is dumb enough to make himself Trumps personal scapegoat?

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Very “not the onion”.

common jorkin dapeanus vance l

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

"I fucked those couches" [gestures towards couches]

-J.D. Couch-Fucker

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Hey, weirdo from middletown, you barely won as a republican in Ohio fuck off

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
501 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4748 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS