this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
196 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59429 readers
2799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 77 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Garbage ads have been a thing almost since the dawn of the Internet and we found a solution to them years ago. They're called ad blockers. If you are online and not using an ad blocker: Why? That's like finding a $2/night hooker and not using a condom.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The article did mention ad-blockers:

Some users take back control from online ads by installing ad-blocker software. These can be free versions in the form of a browser extension, or more advanced versions with a subscription fee.

I think you underestimate how technologically illiterate the average person is. Many people do not even understand the difference between a web browser and a search engine - they use Chrome because they think that's the only way to perform a Google search.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ew. Speaking of technological illiteracy, the author is irresponsibly contributing to it by insinuating that subscription fee ad blockers are somehow inherently better than free ones, which is not only absolute bullshit but also pretty much anti-Free Software propaganda.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

My kids are not what I’d call tech illiterate but they are growing up with all of it taken for granted. They don’t really understand the terms “internet” as distinct from “website” as distinct from “your phone.” It’s just kind of all “on your phone” to them.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was promised that surveillance capitalism would mean high quality ads that improved my quality of living. :blessed:

[–] kennebel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When I can’t block the ads, I always opt for the “non-personalized ads” option, since I know they are getting paid less. Also easier to ignore an ad when it is random.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Garbage ads predate the internet.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

$2/a night? Okay Mr Moneybags, must be nice to be so rich!

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Eloquently/elegantly put

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 2 months ago

Firefox plus uBlock Origin is what you can do about it. I hardly ever see any ads. SponsorBlock is great if you watch youtube too.

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] hoghammertroll@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

Yeah I see seeing ads as a skill issue tbh

[–] tal@lemmy.today 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For example, Google Chrome has stopped the use of auto-play video.

Even setting aside ads, that was virtually always something that I did not want.

If websites like CNN want someone to watch video, put the video up with autoplay off. If someone wants to watch it, they can start it playing.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But then they can't ~~force you to watch~~ claim that you watched the ad at the start of the video for that sweet advertiser revenue.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] raker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

🤷‍♂️

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It indiscriminately pollutes the environments it’s projected in to, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising the mass hoarding of personal information which is uneconomical to appropriately secure.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Because it's "too hard" for websites to have proper relationships with advertisers vs just signing onto an ad network.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I still think targeted ads should be illegal. I would accept static ads that are based on the content of the site rather than me as a compromise.

So like if I'm looking at example.com/cool-bikes you can show me bike ads. You don't need to know who I am or track me.

It's good enough for the past few decades (centuries?) it's good enough for now. The Superbowl doesn't serve a different ad to every viewer.

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And targetted ads aren't that much more effective than context based. So the internet has been compromised, misinformation has run rife, and platforms hijacked to threaten democratic nations so some corporations can have 6% more effective advertising. What a deal. I believe thats the approx effectiveness difference.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah or bike adjacent stuff.. helmet, chain lube.. hell even a biking vacation.. but stop with the profiling

[–] funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago

Because US capitalism.

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Remember the purpose of ads is to advertise a product that might potentially sell. Quality control isn't always a priority it's capitalism after all. At the end of the day, if you just want to block ads, just block ads.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

there are products that I would buy if I would know they exist but I don't because they don't have enough money to do advertisment. It's inherently an unfair competition. The only ads that I would like to see is a tematical search for all of the buyable products and services.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
***
that might potentially sell
+++ that is pushed with money
[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 7 points 2 months ago

Here's what I do about it:

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The AI generated car ads are just awful, I made a post about it:

https://lemmy.world/post/14053496

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

The reason is programmatic advertising and Google has 90% market share there. Btw, it helps spreading misinformation too.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

What can we do about it? Is this some grandpa's first time on the internet?

[–] theredbit@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, it may be difficult to do much without some kind of intervention at a larger scale (i.e. government intervention) but so much money is made from these ads. Money talks. There are also people who don’t know about ad blockers or simply don’t care to run one.

I do agree with one comment below of static advertisements to promote a product or service . It reminds me something like tv commercials. The targeted ones is just asking for trouble for your privacy and getting scammed.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

What really annoys me is the endless stream of scam, "earn money fast with 1 simple trick" ads

It's literally a scam every single time and trying to report those fall into deaf ears (or blind algorithms) because hey, they're paying to be shown, why should any high ranking executive care? "Oh, I can't be held responsible, sorry!"

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Don't people use ad blockers? If not, learn how to use one instead to complain.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wanna know why prices everywhere went up so much? They had to pay all the advertising companies for the billions of ads they’ve been trying to force us to watch everywhere, from tv to internet to roadside billboards. So the consumer had to pay.

(No, not really, but it sure feels that way)

[–] noisypine@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

All ads are garbage. There's no such thing as a good ad. They are in place to push an entities will upon you, there is no upside to any ad for the viewer. Firefox and Ublock Origin for safety and sanity.

load more comments
view more: next ›