cool story, but is there any data that corroborates that? i'm genuinely asking
bunitor
i think that's the crux of the issue when it comes to making core-dwellers understand that they do benefit from imperialism: they think it's a moral judgement on their character rather than a factual observation
sometimes an insult is well-earned. suck it up and don't take it too personally
good god, could gringos read one fucking article about dependency theory, please?
it is really concerning to see most commenters taking the claim that autistic people are more likely to commit crime at face value, not only doing so without any data to back it up, but also unaware (or willfully ignorant) that the data says otherwise: autistic people are more likely to be victims of violent crime than allistic people. this is a dangerous narrative fueled by preexisting hatred of neurodivergent people that only serves to further marginalize us.
this kind of narrative is unfortunately the expected anywhere else, but seeing it play out in a forum specifically about autism is particularly upsetting. if you're neurotypical and you're spreading this here, kindly go fuck yourself (also go look for actual data, not biased anecdotes by sensationalist media); if you're autistic, though, please please please do not believe this shit, you are the vulnerable side of autism, not the people around you.
tl;dr
as for the title: yes
[settler colonialism] slows down the centralization of capitalism and allows for the creation of a large petite landowning population
tf lmao
colonialism as whole is a necessary precondition to modern capitalism and imperialism. it is, in absolutely no way, a setback to capitalism and is in fact the only reason global capitalism and western dominance was possible at all
is this what yankee communists actually believe?
I do believe that some traits of Autism could lead to a higher chance to commit some crimes
i'm not sure about that, though. iirc neurodivergent people (including autists) are more likely to be victims of violent crime than neurotypicals
title makes it look like firefox is just removing yet another security feature as part of its enshittification process, but reading the article it looks like it makes sense
- not a lot of websites respect dnt
- it might serve as an identifier, i think
lmao
thank you
this is the second luigi meme in a row. what did i miss?
insults can teach shame when necessary. they can also communicate when you're sharing an opinion that might make people upset and make you mindful of it next time you decide to share your thoughts. in any case, there's a very relevant difference between a response that communicates "i disagree and here's why" and a response that communicates "wtf bro", and that's not simply self-indulgence
edit: in the case of this thread specifically, the insult is well earned because the post is typical of a gringo gringoing and not being able to accept all the comfort and benefits they're granted for being gringo. it's like shaking the poster back to reality and making it clear his line of reasoning is not just incorrect, but also ridiculous