143
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Guamer@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

This is based on 43 states being considered "non-negotiable" and "set in stone" while only 7 are considered "swing" states

Also consider I specified "voters", who are at best only 2/3 of the total population, which leaves out about 100 million extra people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

The same outcome could be achieved by holding a run-off election in the case were nobody wins 50% outright.

[-] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Nah cuz its still just too big and too fast. Small candidates need like time to build up momentum to get off the ground. And they cant break thru and get traction in a huge national election at all cuz they dont have the funds to buy ad space and stuff nationally yet. Limiting it to a small area makes it a lot cheaper to compete.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13480 readers
893 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS