this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13601 readers
913 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
PaX@hexbear.net
143
Democracy is when only 14% of voters get to decide an entire election and the other 86% are functionally meaningless (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Guamer@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is based on 43 states being considered "non-negotiable" and "set in stone" while only 7 are considered "swing" states

Also consider I specified "voters", who are at best only 2/3 of the total population, which leaves out about 100 million extra people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"If you don't like the candidates, vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting and then campaign to get it adopted!" ~I\ personally\ am\ fine\ with\ the\ status\ quo\ and\ will\ do\ nothing\ to\ help\ but\ good\ luck\ out\ there\ kiddo.~

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting

So, Claudia de la Cruz?

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

No, silly, she can't win because it has been foreordained as such.