71
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by hypercracker@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

awooga

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Women are not allowed pockets of any sort, whether they be on shirts or pants. Or something.

[-] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

Women’s clothes are not intended for hiding witchcraft within!

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My chud family member says "women chose to have pocketless clothing because that's what they buy"

This chud is an adult woman who believes in traditionalism, watches Matt Walsh etc. but has a child out of wedlock. The contradictions are endless.

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

It’s of a similar vein with republicans who want abortion banned but sneak away in the dead of night to have their love child aborted. The disconnect is there and it is fucking real.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

The mind bottles

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Chuds are evil, evil people.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

My 1.5yr old has more functional pockets in his wardrobe then my wife does.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)

technology

23265 readers
135 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS