71
it also took away the pockets from her outfit
Women are not allowed pockets of any sort, whether they be on shirts or pants. Or something.
Women’s clothes are not intended for hiding witchcraft within!
My chud family member says "women chose to have pocketless clothing because that's what they buy"
This chud is an adult woman who believes in traditionalism, watches Matt Walsh etc. but has a child out of wedlock. The contradictions are endless.
It’s of a similar vein with republicans who want abortion banned but sneak away in the dead of night to have their love child aborted. The disconnect is there and it is fucking real.
watches Matt Walsh
WHY? 
The mind bottles
Chuds are evil, evil people.
My 1.5yr old has more functional pockets in his wardrobe then my wife does.
This is to be expected. AI will model itself after the data that was entered in. And since that data is sexist, racist, misogynistic, and otherwise, the outputs will skew that way too.
This is the most obviously damning reason why AI cannot possibly be useful as it is today.
AI cannot possibly be useful
It's useful to techbros playing Mirror Mirror On The Wall, coming up with bleakly uninspired "remakes" of their treats, and gooning.
So not useful then 
useful to validation-seeking computer touchers, boring treat hogs, and gooners. 
machine learning also in practicality helped to solved protein folding sequences. every technology in history has good and terrible uses. It's like how movable print contributed to great things and also helped the Protocols of Zion and Der Sturmer come into existence. As always it is a question of ownership and socio-economic structural incentives
Similarly, the cotton gin could have been strictly a societal improvement but the slavery industry made slavery worse by expanding with the cotton gin's use, and that persisted until slavery was (mostly) abolished.
"We spared no expense" from Jurassic Park but it's training all your LLMs on huge tits anime girls.
the cloth stretch marks around the button are SENDING me lmao
The algorithm doesn't just inherit the politics of the computer touchers coding it. It inherits the gooner tendencies too.
inherits their politics
inherits their sexual pathologies
My hate for this bazinga shit is pure, and my contempt for treat printer proselytizers intensifies.
Yes, that is emotional and I own that emotion, I say to one particularly smug robot-LARPing pretend-leftist fuck. They know who they are.
Just to clarify, they were uncropping a version that was just the top half of the original picture, so the differences were in the part it "reimagined", not changing things that were already there (in what it was given).
Still, obviously, and I cannot stress this enough - yikes.
gigo, garbage in garbage out
i really don't understand the comments acting like it AWOOGAfied her, like she says it added "a hint of a bra" but it just looks like an undershirt?? i literally could not tell which image was supposedly the awoogafied AI version without reading the twitter thread. Literally the original is "sexier," the AI deawoogafied her
showed this to my gf and she said the same thing, she thought the color image was the AI one "made sexier"
Look at the stretch marks around the button as though her tits about to explode that fastener into outer space
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)
technology
23265 readers
132 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS