this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
156 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13804 readers
490 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kicking off the BIGGEST, most BEAUTIFUL trade talks. SIX countries a week, EIGHTEEN total! Some will make incredible DEALS, others will go home EMPTY-HANDED. Only the best get America’s business! VERY EXCITING! Stay tuned!!! trump-feed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

hate to say it but Trump is not beating the great khan allegations, all nations of the world must bring him tribute

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't know why they haven't stumbled into the idea of tributary nations. Sure that's already indirectly a thing. But you can't tell me it doesn't appeal to Trump to demand protection money directly.

[–] determinism2@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago

The tributary countries are all being accused of having trade surpluses against the US.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

every ambassador to the US is probably scrambling to order valuable gifts to personally bestow before these meetings

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

That would be absolutely hilarious if the US came crashing down because Trump got 47 Ronin'd.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what NATO is and the whole point of letting Europe bear the weight of the war in Ukraine is to make them pay for America's war.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sure that's already indirectly a thing

The point is not that the US isn't extracting value from their client state, the point is that current US leadership is venal enough that they would desire a direct extraction of species.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair, but in my mind if we can consider a tax credit a form of government spending, getting someone else to pay for something you were doing is basically getting them to pay you.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Basically

see there you go. Remember we are dealing with a ruling class who think getting industrial goods in return for an IOU is a rip off on behalf of the IOU writer. There is a layer of obfuscation between the money and the American government and that is why they're mad currently. I am saying it is odd that they have not discovered that they can just ask for money directly by means of threats.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Great Khan but all the conquest was done already

How very Amerikkkan