this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
7 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Power users and mods just keep repeating: "History is not a science because culture (i.e., god) is all-powerful. We might use evidence but we distrust grand theories."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megasteel32@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

you're not arguing for grand theories right?

[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I've understood hm to be a method not a theory, no?

The underlying theory would be material causality?

[–] megasteel32@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

wouldn't it be both?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)