this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
195 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
9 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are lots of other galaxy-brain moments there.

"Single payer economies leads to bad things like Bolshevism and Stalin"

@UlyssesT@hexbear.net Let's hear your rant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago (34 children)

Do not use the term FOSS, it conflates Free Software with Open Source

[–] megasteel32@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago (8 children)

as it should, because open source software should be free. GNU can shove it.

[–] jaeme@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

They are seperate because they both have different motivation, tactics, and origins.

Open source could also be used to describe a development methodology (public repo that accepts pull requests/patches with a license that allows redistribution). Free means that the user is entitled to all 4 freedoms (use, study, modify and distribute, or redistribute).

The Free software movement works to create a world of entirely free software. Open source initiative does not make that claim. OSI is more pragmatics (at a cost) while the FSF is more ideologically focused (likewise)

We have this distinction because it matters and that it reduces confusion. GNU doesn't go "shove it."

[–] megasteel32@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

GNU can absolutely go shove it when they keep trying to shove GPLv3 down my throat.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)