this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
182 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15909 readers
17 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Milord has no choice but to take measures against the other peasants who have been possessed by woke transgender demons to steal from him ๐Ÿ˜”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] psivchaz@reddthat.com 8 points 11 months ago

It's been my experience that they calculate it all stupid, then react to that miscalculation in a dumb way, and inconvenience everyone as a result.

Suppose they have a product they buy for $8 and sell for $10. They get the number of all that got bought but not sold, which may include ones that weren't actually received or that were damaged during shipping and stocking or just left out and went bad or accidental "theft" or actual theft, and they multiply that number by $10. So now on paper they have "lost" a bunch of money to theft, even though they actually lost 20% less than the number they came up with AND they have no way to know how much of it was theft versus other shrinkage.

Now that they have this exorbitant number, they can use it to justify buying a million anti-theft devices. Which reduces the amount people buy because those things suck, but they can blame that on shoplifters too because it's all their fault that the anti-theft devices were "needed." And in the end none of it matters anyway because 1 theft is not the same as 1 lost sale to begin with.