116
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

also bodies are not inherently sexual like a woman just standing around in a bathing suit is not an inherently sexual thing

twerking is only sexual in the mind of the observer

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

twerking is only sexual in the mind of the observer

jesse-wtf

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago

Ikr, twerking is clearly a dialectic

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago

twerking has as many roots in traditional african dance as it does in the club and is something that arose primarily among black women

its overly sexualization is a result of patriarchy and white supremacy twisting a dance that black woman who are comfortable in their bodies are doing to try and play into the racist and sexist stereotypes of the "aggressively sexual" black woman

this is my understanding of the issue from the black feminist point of view that ive read but maybe everyone disagrees with that i dunno

[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 11 points 9 months ago

It's no more sexual than ballet, which is to say quite a bit but there doesn't have to be.

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"Someone call the deparment of transportation on this dumptruck👀" Is the caption under that. You aren't technically wrong. None of this had to be sexual and shouldn't be inherently sexual but you are giving Rockstar way to much of a benefit of doubt.

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago

True but Rockstar put that woman in a bikini in a male gazey way intentionally to draw sex sells eyes so I think that in this case that doesn't apply. (the twerking is a reference to a real life incident, the trailer is full of refrences to "florida man" type incidents).

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

i dunno i just see a woman in a bikini it really doesnt come across as sexualized at all like im really not seeing it so either im completely wrong on this one or everyone in this sub is objectifying this character and telling on themselves

edit: maybe being a florida man himself who has been to south beach plenty of times its just so tame and normalized to sofla beach culture which has the ocassional women in a micro bikini so small it barely covers the vaginal opening and areolas... ill let yall google pics "south beach micro bikini" if you want to know what i mean

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're objectively wrong. Unless you've never played GTA before, how can you seriously suggest a bikini model in a GTA game is anything but not sexualized? The shots of the women walking around on the beach or raving are not sexual because they're just existing (though maybe that'll change once we hear the dialogue), but the ones in the screenshots are twerking and posing seductively. And if you seriously think twerking is not sexual, especially in the US, then you're probably going to suggest that the strip club in the trailer is not sexual either. And yes, we are objectifying the character because that's literally the point since the beginning of GTA. Just because you don't feel anything when you see the girl doesn't change the nature of the game. I feel nothing when I see Marilyn Monroe, so that means she wasn't sexualized, right?

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago

i didnt say strippers in a strip club arent sexual why would you imply that

im saying a woman in a really normal swim suit just standing there is not sexual shes just there like looking at the sky or whatever

the woman twerking on the car is doing this wild thing but no, i dont think twerking in and of itself is inherently sexual

and no i dont think just because its in a video game its automatically sexual either

sexualization is as much something in the mind of the viewer as the intention of the person who is dressing the way they are or doing the things they are (or the artist of that model) and in this case as most others people here are sexualizing this stuff themselves as it may be done by the artists

[-] the_itsb@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

I googled them, and they don't seem that much smaller than string bikinis from the 80s and 90s. What am I missing? People are being driven wild with lust by this.....???

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

im just saying that the bikini in the trailer is very tame, normal and not sexualized

the pose is just her looking at the sky shes not leaning forward and pushing out her chest or squeezing her breasts together or something ridiculous she like just standing there, i dunno i really truly dont see the sexualization here it jsut seems so mundane and normal

look at it this way, what would be a non sexual way for her to stand? like should she slump and look depressed? should she cover her body? i dont think a woman needs to be covered or stand in such a way that she seems to be shy of her body in order to be nonsexual she can like, i dunno, just be and wear what she wants and thats fine but maybe im wrong

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago

But it's GTA, so women are inherently sexual in the game.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
116 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
394 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS