this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023

216 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13519 readers

969 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

216

This might be a good investment strategy actually (hexbear.net)

submitted 10 months ago by HarryLime@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 36 points 10 months ago

Shockingly no, insider trading applies to "material, nonpublic information" about the company and its economic actions. If you're trading based on advance knowledge of a subscription price hike or a change in recipe, that's insider trading. If you're trading based on people getting mad for literally no reason or a company's continued compliance with a law or social norm, that's not insider trading.