this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023

216 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13934 readers

651 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

216

This might be a good investment strategy actually (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by HarryLime@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago

Shockingly no, insider trading applies to "material, nonpublic information" about the company and its economic actions. If you're trading based on advance knowledge of a subscription price hike or a change in recipe, that's insider trading. If you're trading based on people getting mad for literally no reason or a company's continued compliance with a law or social norm, that's not insider trading.