82

I noticed people started to use the idea of “no ethical consumption under capitalism” to just be completely irresponsible and just stop trying at all. I don’t think the point of that is to give up completely lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago

This one kills me, when I read the original definition and realized that people were studying the forced emotions required of customer service workers it felt good, like, almost relieving, that an academic, someone in a position of authority, recognized and took seriously the toll that that takes.

Now it means like, listening to your friend complain about their boss or something?

I'm not even upset that "the strain of hearing about other people's hardships" has a term to describe it, but why use one that was describing the way servers, baristas, flight attendants, cashiers and call center agents have to maintain a constant appearance of happiness while being degraded by the people speaking to them?

[-] thebartermyth@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

Yeah, it also sucks because if you try to explain that "emotional labor" has a specific meaning it makes you the bad guy for invalidating someone.

People also use it as a defense from having to do self-crit.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13497 readers
881 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS