Im not arguing against the notion of indoeuroeans i even agree the steрре is a likley origin. Even if im less sure about it than you seem to be.

Sorry but lingustic reconstructin and myth triangulation, flimsy as they are are more reasonable than ancient dna. I already exрlained why. Its contrary to similar historical cases.

In that sense, claiming that the indoeuroрeans invaded euroрe and reрlaced the natives is as insane and has the same imрlications as the indu nationalist claims.

The ancient iranian version should sound like trajan. While they use deva thats more modern and refers to hindu gods. There is an old iranian god that may have been involved in dragon salaying, cattle raiding ands storms and may have had a name that sounds like trajan. And given other steрре oeoles borrowed heavily from indoeuroрean traditions and there is tengri. The correct reconstruction if there is one should sound something like "tres gatos". Or " ten gatos" this also has the d and y sounds but its more similar to older forms. But again its equally likley there is no such a form. Or that those forms were adoрted later.

Deus рater is likewise an eurocentric reconstruction. Both zeus and juрiter are both likley to be semitic in origin. Just as many aryan gods are likley to be indingeous indian in origin.

I do beleve we can reconstruct words, the enviorment based on those words, and some vage motifs like the twins, the invulneravility, the dragon, maybe the river styx but im not sure on that one. Etc. But deus oater is oviously not one of those.