this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
39 points (91.5% liked)

Asklemmy

45274 readers
1314 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From Spain here, when we want to speak about USA people we use the term "yankee" or "gringo" rather than "american" cause our americans arent from USA, that terms are correct or mean other things?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 27 minutes ago

In the USA, Yankee refers to mainly northeast US, including the New York City area. Western Americans would be neutral about being called that and you might piss off some southerners.

My exposure to the term gringo has mainly been that it refers to white Americans. I don't know if you would call a black American gringo or how they would accept it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Just say "idiots." Source: USA citizen.

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 hours ago

No no, he has a point...

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Do you not have a term in Spanish?

If y'all use yank, yankee, or gringo, they're all fine.

But, American is fine too. If you're using English, everyone will know what you mean. It isn't like it hasn't been the term used in English for at least a century.

Here the thing. If you're referring to someone from one of the two/three americas, you specify north, central and south. That depends a little on whether you consider all three as discrete areas, or not, but that's the norm in English.

If you want to refer to all people from the americas at once, Americans is also fine. Context will carry which way you're using it. English is fairly easy to make contextual indicators like that.

An example: "oh, Americans love their flag". Which americans are we talking about? The ones with a specific American flag. Which, the statement isn't universally true, it's just an example.

If you aren't using English, it doesn't matter at all, use whatever terminology is the norm in that language.

The reason it doesn't matter is that there really isn't an "American" people in the continental sense. The cultures of the continents don't even have a unifying effect, though you do have some connection between Spanish speaking vs Portuguese, vs native, vs English, etc. The language links in South America are much more significant than the fact that they live on the same continent.

Any time you'd be referring to the entire Americas, or the peoples of them, you'd specify that because there's not a single American continent.

One nation out of all of them being america really isn't a difficulty in conversation. It's a non issue.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 34 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Being from the USA, I can confidently say “Yankee” is a term that is fairly neutral in meaning. People from the South states use it to refer to basically any American not from the South, and I get the sense people from the UK use it to refer to anyone from the USA.

In my experience, “Gringo” seems to be a term used by Spanish-speakers (even ones from North and South America) to refer to English speakers who think they’re better than everyone, so it appears to be a term with negative connotations

[–] temporal_spider@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Texan here. Yankee is definitely not a neutral word to refer to everyone from the USA. Some people down here will fight you over it, but most would just give you a confused look.

I've always understood gringo to mean white person, especially one who can't speak Spanish. The term is sometimes used in Mexican restaurants to let the staff know that you can't deal with too many jalapeños.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

I've heard gringo is about language, primarily English. Not about being a whitey

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Do Southerners use Yankee pejoratively to refer to northerners?

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Yes, since the civil war era.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 2 points 16 minutes ago (1 children)

Or as my husband's Southern-ass grandma called it, the "war of northern agression" 🙄

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 minutes ago

Reflexively I wanted to downvote that 😒

[–] temporal_spider@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

I'm afraid so. There are a lot of people still fighting our Civil War, the one that supposedly ended over 150 years ago. Even without those troglodytes, there is a distinct cultural difference between the North and South, as I think there is in many countries. We tend to rub each other the wrong way sometimes.

Old joke about the difference. Walk up to a Southerner's house, and they say, "can I help you?" Walk up to a Yankee's house, and it's, "whaddya want?"

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

In my experience (as a Brit), people generally only refer to Americans as Yanks in a mildly pejorative way or if we're taking the piss, otherwise it's Americans.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Southerners are the same way. Nobody calls us yanks as a compliment

i believe Brits call Americans "yanks"

[–] TheWolfOfSouthEnd@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 8 hours ago

U.K. bloke here…I don’t use it personally, just because, but yeah we say it for anyone from the USA.

When I was about 10 or so someone local to me had a lawsuit because his colleagues called him Yankee and he claimed it was racism, fairly certain he won, but it was an obscure case.

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It's a weird lacuna of the English language, there's no official word for estadounidense.

[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

In Italian we have an equivalent, Statunitensi, but Americani is probably used more often to mean the same thing

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The reason for this is simple: the word in English is "American". Because in English speaking countries, it is almost universally the case that we talk about the 7 continents. And in the rare case we talk about 6 continents, it's from merging Europe and Asia (which, frankly, is blatantly a far superior model of the continents), not merging North America and South America.

So "America" unambiguously refers to the country, and there's no need for estadounidense, any more than there's a need for "commonwealthian" for someone from the Commonwealth of Australia.

[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] mattyroses@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 52 minutes ago

They're just Americans anyways

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I think the point the previous user is getting at is that there is no continent of "America" in most English-speaking countries—there is North America and South America.

Canada is in North America but it's not in "America," which without the North/South prefix, will make most English-speaking people assume you mean the US and not the continent Canada and the US are on.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

imo, 'gringo' has no special meaning unless it was given one from a local group. like how "let's go brandon" only makes sense on a specific group.

'yankee' used to have a specific one before, i.e. north-eastern US bros, but it got saturated and now could be used generally. imo, 'yankee' usage has ye olde vibe to it, but maybe that's just me.

EDIT: corrected 'southern', thanks to Denvil

[–] Denvil@lemmy.one 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 3 points 6 hours ago

thanks! missed that one.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (6 children)

In America, yankee means people from a particular part of America. But we use it here in Australia to mean any American. It's especially fun when people from the south (that is…the south of the country America, not from the continent of South America) take offence at the term IMO.

We also use "seppo" which is an Australian shortening slang of "septic", which is rhyming slang (of the kind used in both Australia and London, England) that comes via "septic tank" via "yank".

Gringo seems strange to me. I thought that was a predominantly Latin American term for white people, and would apply equally well to Americans as Canadians as Australians as (of particular relevance to someone from Spain) English…but only the white of each, so it would seem to me it shouldn't work as synonymous with "American" because it excludes African Americans, Asian Americans, etc. But I'm not Spanish or Latin American, so I might just be misunderstanding the word.

Edit: what yank means depending on where you are (allegedly):

[–] FloMo@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Hispanic here, I grew up using “gringo” specifically for people from the U.S. despite skin tone.

Canadians are “Canadiense”, English are “Ingles” but United States? “Estadounidense”? It’s sort of like saying “United Statian” but arguably more “correct/proper”

Gringo is just much faster/easier to say.

That being said this can vary a little from one Latin-American country to another.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Seppo, septic tank, yank. Love it! Cockney rhyming slang strikes again?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

Australian rhyming slang in this case, but yeah, it functions in much the same way as Cockney.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] meliante@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Burros como o caralho is Portuguese for USAians.

It translates to something like dumb as fuck.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 22 points 10 hours ago

Dumbfuckistan has a certain ring to it when you put it that way.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Gringo and yankee are both fine. However, it's most correct to refer to people from the USA by their birth state.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Or where they currently live.

Or, the case of NYC Puerto Ricans, both (New Yorican lol)

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 1 points 2 hours ago

I suppose it depends on context, but someone who was born in PR, but lives in NYC, is a Puerto Rican. Someone born in NYC to a Puerto Rican family is a New Yorican. Both people are ethnically Puerto Rican, but only one is from Puerto Rico.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This probably isn’t helpful for referring to all Americans but in the U.S., we use whatever state/regjon within the United States a person is from as the demonym. So, someone from California would be Californian, someone from Texas would be Texan. For a regional example, someone from the Northeast would be a New Englander.

For most of the history of the Republic, the states viewed themselves sort of like EU countries do now: independent states in America that united. It probably wasn’t until the World Wars that it changed.

It can get more complicated, unfortunately. Native Americans would probably use their tribal name instead of the state, for instance. But that’s why we don’t have a demonym and everyone has resorted to USian or USAian on message boards.

[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wish Oregonians were called Oregonos instead because sounding like a spice is cool. lol

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Oregonos sounds like part of a complete breakfast.

[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Oregano-s and Oregon-O’s. I like it.

I'm USAian. (just identifying for this thread, i don't call myself that)

would "gringo" include Black USAians? Asian USAians? Spain-born USAians?

from my understanding of "gringo", that doesn't seem to include non-white USAians. Most English monolingual USAians think that means "white guy".

a lot of gen z USAians might not know the word Yankee as a term for USAians. if speaking to them, you might have to explain it's not the baseball team.

maybe it's better to stick with "USAians". it's never been used but it's easy to figure out. other possible choices are:

  • Statesians
  • USAliens
  • USAmericans
  • Staters
  • Stater Tots (re: tater tots)
  • USticles

better yet, call each of us by the state we're each from. that's the safest bet. you know all our 50 state names right? and their official demonyms? 🤣 kidding

[–] redrumBot@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I prefer the formal name in spanish of estadounidense (united-statistian) to American.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 6 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Not too sure about gringo but I know yankee is correct, I hear that one a lot from folks I know in the UK.

There's some weird linguistic drift where in the southern US, we call northerners yankees, even though in the rest of the world we're all yankees. Now I'm curious how that started.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the USAians are so dominant in the region of the Americas that they've coopted the term American for most people. My Columbian friend hates when we refer to USAians as Americans because he says "hey we were here first" 😆. But unfortunately that's the way it is.

Yanks or Yankee Doodles is what we used to call them but they get rather upset these days when you call them that. I wouldn't call them gringos because it just sounds unnatural for a Brit to say that seriously.

[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago

I like to look at it this way. The full name of Mexico is the United States of Mexico. But we still call them Mexicans.

It’s totally okay to call people from the United States of America as Americans. Everyone knows what you mean anyways.

load more comments
view more: next ›