this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

History

23518 readers
99 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Yuan Dynasty was established by the Mongols and ruled China from 1271 to 1368 CE. Their first emperor was Kublai Khan (r. 1260-1279 CE) who finally defeated the Song Dynasty which had reigned in China since 960 CE. Stability and peace within China brought a certain economic prosperity for some as Kublai and his successors promoted international trade which saw the now-unified country open up to the wider world. While there was peace in the western part of the Mongol Empire, Kublai launched two unsuccessful invasions of Japan and several others elsewhere in South East Asia. The Mongols' reign in China was finally ended due to a lethal cocktail of endless infighting amongst their leaders, inept and corrupt government which overspent and overtaxed, floods and famines. Peasant uprisings rumbled throughout the 14th century CE until one, led by the Red Turban Movement, toppled the Yuan and brought in a new regime, the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644 CE).

Kublai Khan & the Song

In 1268 CE Kublai Khan focussed on finally knocking out the Song Dynasty and establishing himself, as all nomadic leaders before him had dreamed of, as the emperor of China. The Mongols had already made several major attacks on Song territory, notably during the reigns of Genghis Khan (r. 1206-1227 CE) in 1212-1215 CE and of Mongke Khan (r. 1251-1259 CE) in 1257-1260 CE. Equipped with an army of over 1,000,000 men, a large naval fleet, and immense wealth, Song China would prove a stubborn opponent to the otherwise invincible Mongol military machine. The success of Mongol warfare across Asia had been based on fast cavalry, but the Song countered this by deliberately adopting a strategy of more static warfare and building great fortifications at key cities and river crossings. For this reason, it would take eleven long years for Kublai to pick off his targets one by one and finally batter the Song into submission.

The Mongols were helped by many Song generals defecting or surrendering their armies, and the fact the imperial court was beset by infighting between the child emperor's advisors. Ultimately, the empress dowager and her young son Emperor Gongzong (r. 1274-5 CE) surrendered along with their capital Lin'an on 28 March 1276 CE. The Song royals were taken prisoner to Kublai's new capital at Beijing (Daidu). Groups of loyalists fought on for three more years, installing two more young emperors in the process (Duanzong and Dibing), but the Mongols swept all before them. Finally, on 19 March 1279 CE a great naval battle was won at Yaishan near modern-day Macao; the Mongol conquest of China was complete. It was the first time that country had been unified since the 9th century CE, not that this was much consolation to the countless dead, robbed and displaced across China.

Establishing Government

Making himself emperor of China, Kublai gave himself the reign name Shizu and, in 1271 CE, his new dynasty the name 'Yuan', meaning either 'origin' or 'centre, main pivot.' The start date of the Yuan Dynasty is variously put at 1260 CE (Mongke's campaign), 1271 CE (first official use of the 'Yuan' dynasty title), 1276 CE (death of the last Song emperor and fall of the Song capital) or 1279 CE (final extinguishing of Song resistance).

Beginning with Kublai, Mongol rulers made some superficial attempts to appeal to their new Chinese subjects by adopting such traditions as emperor's robes, travelling in a sedan chair and surrounding themselves with Confucian advisors. The real power, though, remained in Mongol hands as key administrative positions in the newly created 12 semi-autonomous provinces that China and northern Korea (annexed in 1270 CE) was now divided into largely went to Mongols, especially to members of the very large Mongol imperial bodyguard. The traditional six Chinese ministries, in place since the Tang Dynasty (618-907 CE), continued as before, but there were Mongol institutions, too, like the Shumi Yuan or Ministry of War.

Kublai abolished the civil service examinations which would have favoured Chinese officials with their Confucian education (they were reinstated in 1313 CE but Mongols still received advantages). Although many Chinese officials continued to work as before, they were subject to random and secret inspections by Mongol-trusted censors. The Mongol regional official known as the jarquchi was appointed to Chinese territories, and these and representatives of the various Mongol clans made up a local government for each province. The Mongol police force, the tutqaul, was given the task of ensuring roads were kept free from bandits, and western Asians, particularly Muslims, were often given roles in the financial side of government such as finance ministers and tax inspectors.

A New Social Order

Kublai ensured that Mongols always gained an advantage in China by officially classing them as superior in rank to Chinese. The four official Yuan ranks, based on perceived loyalty to the Yuan rulers, were:

  • Mongols
  • Semu - people from Central Asia and/or speakers of Turkic languages
  • Hanren - northern Chinese, Tibetans, Khitans, Jurchen and others
  • Nanren - southern Chinese formally ruled by the Song.

Being a member of one of the above four classes had repercussions for an individual's tax status, their treatment by the judicial system and their eligibility for positions in the state administration (there was a 25% capped quota for southern Chinese, for example). Differences in treatment included northern Chinese being taxed by household while southern Chinese had to pay according to the area of land they owned. Punishments were a particularly striking area of difference with, for example, a Mongol found guilty of murder only having to pay a fine while a southern Chinese convicted of mere theft was fined and then tattooed as a criminal. The new law code introduced in 1270 CE, however, had only 135 capital crimes, half of those in the code used by the Song.

There were other measures of segregation, too, such as forbidding Chinese to take Mongol names, wear Mongol clothes or learn the Mongol language. Intermarriage was discouraged. Rather than being a solely racially-motivated policy, though, Kublai and his successors were most concerned with controlling their subjects, making it easier to identify who was who and ensuring there were no rebellions; Chinese were forbidden to carry weapons and congregate in public, for example.

At least traditional religions were permitted to continue as long as they did not threaten the state, although Buddhism was generally favoured over the traditional Chinese Confucianism. The Mongols' own preference for shamanism showed no signs of change, although Kublai himself converted to Tibetan (Lamaist) Buddhism.

Foreign Policy & Trade

Kublai Khan was particularly interested in re-establishing the Chinese tribute system which had been neglected during the latter part of the Song's reign. The system had states pay symbolic and material tribute to China's dominant position as the centre of the known world, the 'Middle Kingdom.' Not only was it a means to further legitimise his position as Chinese emperor but it could also bring in useful material goods and help expand international trade. There was also the matter that Mongol rulers legitimised their position through conquest and the distribution of booty to their followers to ensure loyalty and continued service. Kublai, then, embarked on a series of campaigns to bring China's neighbours back to their former position of subservience to the emperor.

In other parts of Asia, to the west, there was relative peace, the so-called Pax Mongolica, although there was a major rebellion in Tibet in the early 1290s CE, and the other descendants of Genghis Khan, especially the Ogedeids, continued to nibble at China's western borders. Nevertheless, the Mongols as a group, by forging an empire from the Black Sea to the Korean peninsula (even if it was now split into large khanates ruled by Genghis Khan's descendants) had managed to expose China to a wider world.

Of more concrete benefit to the Mongols and Chinese than world fame, the Yuan did promote international trade, too. Artisans and craftworkers were given a more elevated status than previously and given tax exemptions. Merchants, not being producers but 'exchangers,' had been discriminated against under the Song, and these, too, now benefitted from more favourable tax measures, low-cost loans and the end of sumptuary regulations.

The effect of these policies was to create a boom in crafts and trade, especially of silk and fine porcelain, the latter product now being supervised by a specific government agency, paving the way for the later Ming potters to gain worldwide fame of their own. Trade also brought a greater exchange of ideas and technologies such as Persian expertise in astronomical observations, maps, luxury textile weaving, and irrigation coming to China, and gunpowder weapons, printing, the mariner's compass, and paper money to the west. Islam also spread further to the east as merchants crisscrossed Asia.

Collapse & Ming Dynasty

By the mid-14th century CE, the Yuan rulers had been beset by a devastating combination of unusually cold winters, famines, plagues, and flooding of the Yellow River which all combined to bring hyper-inflation when the government tried to solve the problems of a damaged infrastructure by printing too much paper money. There followed widespread banditry and uprisings by an overtaxed peasantry. Worse, some of the local elites and provincial administrators in southern China were colluding with the bandits, smugglers and even religious leaders to take over entire towns. Yuan China was disintegrating from within.

The Yuan rulers had not helped themselves by squabbling over power, creating an overblown bureaucracy, and wasting revenue and land resources on a few favoured princes and generals. Most importantly of all, they failed to quash numerous rebellions, including that perpetrated by a group known as the Red Turban Movement, an offshoot of the Buddhist White Lotus Movement, led by a peasant called Zhu Yuanzhang (1328-1398 CE). Zhu replaced the Red Turban's traditional policy aim of reinstating the old Song Dynasty with his own personal ambitions to rule and gained wider support by ditching the anti-Confucian policies which had alienated the Chinese educated classes. Alone amongst the many rebel leaders of the period, Zhu understood that to establish a stable government he needed administrators not just warriors out for loot.

Zhu Yuanzhang's first major coup had been the capture of Nanjing in 1356 CE. Zhu's successes continued, and he defeated his two main rival rebel leaders and their armies, first Chen Youliang at the battle of Poyang Lake (1363 CE) and then Zhang Shicheng in 1367 CE. Zhu was left the most powerful leader in China, and, after taking Beijing, the last Yuan emperor of a unified China, Toghon Temur (r. 1333-1368 CE), fled to Mongolia and the old, now largely abandoned capital Karakorum. The Yuan would, thus, continue to rule in Mongolia under the new name of the Northern Yuan Dynasty (1368-1635 CE). Meanwhile, Zhu declared himself the ruler of China in January 1368 CE. Zhu would take the reign name of Hongwu Emperor (meaning 'abundantly marital') and the dynasty he founded Ming (meaning 'bright' or 'light').

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (6 children)

How many people were actually raised on South Park? I hear it brought up like it’s a huge number but I remember it being on cable and limiting how much of a reach it could get.

Family Guy seemed to have more of a negative impact on edgelord culture because it was more widely available. It played on local channels instead of just the cable ones like South Park did.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It was on TV a lot when I was a kid, but I never cared for it and none of my friends seemed to care either (I guess a lot of context and jokes were lost in the dubbing, and I remember it was one of those Miami dubs). The Simpsons was very popular.

[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

Me and my sister used to watched it a lot when we could

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the US basically every male I knew growing up had seen a lot of South Park, in my cohort most of us had cable and if not we could watch it at a friend's house. I didn't see it at too young of an age because we only had local channels, but by highschool I watched it pretty regularly.

True though, I think Family Guy had a worse impact and was more wide reaching. As terrible as they both are, they did frequently ridicule the racism and police violence of the US, from my view they were closer to being 'woke' than a lot of the media at the time even with their issues.

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

I grew up without cable and was only able to watch at a friends house, but most males my age would talk about it and quote it constantly in middle school high school (2005-2010)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Update on ssris: I don’t have the dickdontwork side effect. After some insomnia went away I’m now able to sleep through the night (used to wake up a lot) and feel really good after 6-7 hours of sleep whereas I used to feel shitty with 8+. Actual miracle drug wtf

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

Glad you can get hard. I never had trouble getting hard after starting SSRI, but my libido did go down especially when I increased dose. But its still there, I just get horny about 30% as often as before

I might need to look into that

[–] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

Cabinet fell off the wall, time to buy some toggle bolts and big washers to fix it.

a lot of old comic dialogue is just kinda like

[Exclaimation]! [Recalling of events leading up to current situation/information that would suggest current situation is unlikely to happen], [Explanation of current situation]! [Explanation of what current situation implies]!!!

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

The book I want to read is a personal PDF reformat of a publicly available text document that can only be found on my PC... which is currently not turning on. ooooooooooooooh

[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

House Season 4 spoilersExcellent detail that Thirteen finds out she has Huntington's disease in the finale along with Amber's death. When it rains it pours and fuck the audience, they get no reprieve. I feel like the 2000s-2010s were maybe the only time mass entertainment TV was allowed to get that miserable.

[–] other_platypus@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

I think season 4 is my favourite, I feel like it rapidly declines from there though

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I feel like given that video essays now have the turn around time of actual films, they should be judged by that standard. By which standards they're all pretty bad.

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

for fucking real. the only worthwhile ones are low-quality documentary level just on topics more traditional documentaries haven't covered.

if you put in less effort than that you must demand less time--or perish qin-shi-huangdi-fireball

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

I couldn't agree more. Even if I know on some level it makes me a bit entitled. I just don't see why I should give more "grace" to my judgement of a product that takes as long as a documentary to make by people who sometimes have more stable incomes and better connections than a lot of entry level documentary film-makers.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don’t know how anyone sits through the ones lasting over five hours

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

There's a bunch of 8 hour long recaps of various kid shows, and honestly I almost respect that. At least you're putting in an honest 9-5 at that point, even if what you are making is slop.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

taiwanese politics are so fking cooked

The KMT (the ostensibly pro-China, anti-independence party now) is now having a rally against the DPP (pro-independence libs, party colour green) with the slogan "Oppose the dictatorial Green-commies"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Moss@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I might try to become the new pope. It can't be that hard. I was raised Catholic and I have lots of guilt.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

Any Discordian could ease your mind by letting you know that you are already a pope.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

I dreamed of a fun kink accessory idea I don't think I've ever seen in the real world. Easy to make and totally safe. I'm inspired to do some hobbyist woodworking today. Off to the hardware store!

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

Cut my life into beanis

This is my last resort

[–] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

What the helllebronjames

[–] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I rant about this week's Dr Who (spoilers ahead)

The next stop on the Doctor's attempt to get Belinda home has them arrive inside a dropship as it's actively deploying a squad to investigate an abandoned space station on an uninhabited planet where they- SUPRISE FUCKERS it's actually a follow-up to Midnight. Y'know Midnight the episode that fans like for its tense, paranoid atmosphere, with its one-off monster that no-one actually sees. The one where a sightseeing tour almost chucks David Tennant out an airlock.

Thousands of years after being kicked off a tour bus for trying to murder everyone onboard, the unnamed monster from Midnight has climbed outta a mineshaft to pull its biggest prank yet on a crew of diamond miners.

They just looked at an episode that people liked and said, "can we make it higher stakes?" The answer is yes, but they really shouldn't've.

This one's going on the meh pile.

What I liked:

  • they've consistently managed to nail the look of these episodes this series. Although it's cannibalising aesthetics from older Dr Who episodes such as The Satan Pit as well as the huge well of space station Sci-fi horror as a whole, the sets and costumes are incredibly well realised. My personal favourite this episode is the Dead Space RIG holoprojecters they use to caption their dialogue when it turns out only the Doctor is able to use BSL to communicate with sole, deaf survivor of the mining crew.

  • this one's more of an appreciation of restraint. They maybe dredged Midnight back up, but at least they didn't try to explain what the whole deal with the creature there. They could've gone the whole weeping angle route and unnecessarily dropped increasingly contradictory and convoluted lore for it. But they didn't (for now).

  • plot twist, there was another and now it's got off-world. Good ending. Dr Who'll often trip over itself and spoil the vibe of an episode to give it a good ending at the last minute and I like this sorta uncertain ending. Though I do worry it's opened the door for them overuse of this thing in the future.

What I didn't like:

  • that it had to be set on Midnight in the first place. The monster doesn't work like it did last time and the Doctor's previous encounter with it doesn't factor into how he figures out to escape it. All it serves to do is remind me of a better episode I could be watching instead.

  • they're trying to build up intrigue around Mrs Flood, and I just don't care. Every time the story grinds to a halt so she can slide onto screen and coyly gesture at a grander plot, I find my eyes drifting to my phone.

Overall:

Better than last week's but still mediocre. Dr Who frequently threatens to be good and it might just be if it can escape the gravitational pull of fan nostalgia baiting.

help the Phaton of the Opera is in my mind

[–] Comrade_Mushroom@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Y'all... I think, maybe, I'm about to start working on the largest creative project of my life. Something I am doing completely devoid of a profit motive. I will probably never share any specific details about it here, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MikeyChaz@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Man at ex wife’s wedding

β€œSpeak now or forever hold your peace”

He internalizes it as β€œspeak now or forever hold in your piss”

He holds in his piss for 2 days and then dies of renal kidney failure

I'm listening to the audiobook for Fairy Tale by Stephen King. It's not bad so far, but it has been funny because it's from the POV of a 16 year old boy in 2013, but it's fairly clear it's written by the then ~75 year old King. The only references to pop culture so far have been Cujo, the original Psycho, and a nonspecific mention that the main character's favorite music is classic rock/heavy metal.

The Cujo reference was pretty astounding because a character references it offhand as a pop culture totem, a thing everyone knows. It didn't feel like a sly wink-wink-nod-nod "I wrote that" from King, it was totally natural.

And while it's not impossible that a 17 year old in 2013 could have seen the 1960 film Psycho, it still definitely feels like a very old man writing about his own youth, or maybe the times when his now-middle-aged sons were young. For the first ten minutes or so I just assumed this story was set in the late '50s like the first half of IT. It wasn't until the narrator mentioned Amazon that I realized it was supposed to be more current.

I'm sure plenty of 17 year olds in 2013 happened to share Stephen King's love of baseball, but there's been no reference to YouTube, or whatever TV was popular among teens that year, or celebrities, or video games. At the very least this guy should have an opinion of Justin Bieber. There's no way the only things a 17 year old in 2013 likes are Psycho, baseball, and classic rock.

[–] MikeyChaz@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

I had a dream I was lost in the sea and I used a large office water jug to float in the sea. I might try this at the beach and see how long I can hold onto it to stay afloat

[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I survived my small aircraft flight. Flying back Sunday

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί