Credit where its due, this is funny.
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15917 readers
8 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
yeah that's funny
"How can it be bimodel if there's only two modes? checkmate librul."
Conservatives will either choose to argue using some overly pedantic technicality or a vague "common sense" oversimplification depending on whichever will paint their position more favorably.
Conservatives really believe we think there is some discreet integer number of genders 😂 When your ability to estimate your opponents is destroyed by your own low-effort "gotcha" clapbacks. Talk about getting high on your own supply.
some people just want to stay stupid it seems
Any way someone could make this post more educational?
I read it as a "flawed illustration". I'm sure there's things left out of the allegory but idk what would be dunkable, I'm guessing there's something I don't know.
assuming this is good faith.
what color would you say this is:
according to this random web app it is:
"Dark Yellow"
aka not Green and not Red.
and it's the predominant color in the middle section of OP's gradient
Right, yeah, there's an interesting sort of "third state" on that bimodal distribution of color.
I think that there are more advanced ways of understanding gender than lumping all nb people into just one color of "in-betweeness", but on a more basic level it shows that if something occurs bimodally, there is plenty of room for things to exist in between.
Important to note that the quoted tweet says sex, not gender, so i think its actually about intersex people?
I think this tweet explains the concept pretty intuitively.
To make it more explicit, you could record a GIF placing the two gradients: pure red (#FF0000) & pure green (#00FF00).
Tell them that red is "man", green is "woman", & blue is "attack helicopter" or "dog", then demonstrate the huge "number" of values between red & green by color-picking random spots on the canvas. Challenge them to find a spot on the canvas has even a smidgen of blue.
Explain the perception of a gender binary by saying most colors are approximately red or approximately green, yet there is still a spectrum of in-between values impossible to succinctly enumerate.
If they genuinely have further questions, it'll be a good opportunity to teach. If not, they're probably deliberately trying to misunderstand.
at a minimum there's green, yellow, orange and red here
this person would fail a kindergarten-level art class
🌱🌱🌰🍂
...so what's the color in the middle? 😐
Man I am hungry for mango now.
Bruh. Even using baby level color recognition I see at least 3.