It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
pointing at Auschwitz
I just... I can't even. How could you just look at a bunch of bread baking ovens and think that? I've been to Germany. They are such nice people. Why would you accuse them of these awful things? It just doesn't make any sense.
Almost feels like there's a vast international conspiracy of (((media institutions))) intended to make the Germans look weak. Damn, wish someone had written a book about his struggle against this kind of thing.
Sites with such a low maximum character count really inspire people to fit as much hate into that limit as possible. Interesting.
So looking at these comments I guess I’m the only one who is wholly unable to decipher the quoted tweet. are they asking jk why she feels compelled to think and speak just like a nazi would, on matters pertaining to gender ? .
There's always a dril tweet
dril is one of the few things I miss from Twitter
I'm going to play devil's advocate here and be way too charitable, is there a chance that she's saying that she never advocated for burning trans research books? That they need to do check their source for HER views, where she's actually a very reasonable and respectable Nazi who would never advocate for burning books?
nah she doubles down in the replies.
Notice how J KKK Rowling changes "trans people were victims of the Nazis" (indisputable historical fact) to "trans people were the first victims of the Nazis" (probably not true, easier to portray as and absurd claim and a possibility to derail the discussion with pointles arguing over who counts as "the first" victims)
Yes I think she got baited into denying an element of Nazi Germany, still funny though
I don't think so. To me it reads very clearly that she thinks the "trans healthcare" part of the Nazi book-burning is what is preposterous. Pretty sure she's one of those transphobes that believes trans people are some kind of modern woke plot that hadn't yet been invented back in the 1930s. Obviously she would also deny upholding Nazi ideology, but she wouldn't use that kind of terminology. What she is calling a "fever dream" is referring to the historical fact of Nazis specifically burning research on trans healthcare, I'd bet my meager life savings on it.
You fknow that whole first they came for [this group] first?
Yeah that was the Nazis and the gender studies institute. Murdering a transgender person and burning the books within. But we don't teach that in schools because it would be inappropriately 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_f%C3%BCr_Sexualwissenschaft
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-forgotten-history-of-the-worlds-first-trans-clinic/
It's sort of wild how almost all of these anti-trans sacks of shits lead themselves to nazi apologists. Also the terf lady could try not being terminally on twitter.
imagine getting so mad at something with 5 views
Hey siri, where does Jk Rowling live?
Why was Lucy Salani sent to a concentration camp and not a POW camp Miss Rowling?
