328
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 180 points 1 month ago

If he's not going to debate her then Harris should literally give a 90 minute PowerPoint on project 2025 and what it will do to your pay your healthcare, your environment everything..

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 100 points 1 month ago

Instead, a comparison between Trump's project 2025 vs her goals might be better. Actually look to the future, instead of the doom and gloom of "don't vote for him" would do wonders to get people excited to vote, which helps turnout.

[-] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Very well said!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Great plan.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 21 points 1 month ago

With a picture of the former president on an empty chair emphasizing and underlining his conscious decision not to participate because he knows he can’t debate her on these points.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Clint Eastwood tried that and it wasn't a good look.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

A PowerPoint will help her connect with the youth. Perhaps she can let them know how project 2025 will roll out over the first few quarters.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Yeah! As a youth, there's nothing that excites me more than quarterly projections!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dwemthy@lemdro.id 9 points 1 month ago

With venn diagrams too

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 120 points 1 month ago

Guys, have you noticed that Harris laughs. Like when she finds something funny she laughs at it. Fucked up, right?

When she was a prosecutor, she put people in jail that pled guilty or were convicted by a jury. What a monster.

Maybe she’s secretly been assuming the duties of the President when Biden wasn’t feeling well. We should look into that. That would make her… bad somehow.

Is she actually Hillary Clinton in a mask, maybe? Can we test that on 4chan?

Good thing we always have old faithful- racism and sexism. That’ll swing those undecideds.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 63 points 1 month ago

My gods I hope he blurts out 'Black Hillary' in one of his rants

[-] Today@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

What color suit does she wear?

[-] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Man you wouldn't believe...

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Unbelievable. I can excuse the demented babbling, corruption, fraud, schoolyard name calling, and brazen lying from my side. But the Dems' insistence on wearing unprofessional suit colors is always shocking and unacceptable.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'll take a nice pantsuit in a casual color rather than a shiny red tie that hangs down past the pantsfly

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It's so weird that they tried to concentrate on her laugh. All it did was highlight that Trump never laughs or shows any kind of positive emotion, like some kind of hateful little goblin.

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How come that live, laugh, love shit is plastered all over every repubs house I've ever been to?

[-] OopsAllTwix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Have we looked at her emails? There has to be something there.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

We probably share the same opinion but if sexism and racist swings any 'undecideds' that just means they're conservatives that are too pussy to say it out loud and pretend they aren't while gargling trumps balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

He should create a platform with goals and policies with detailed plans that will appeal to enough voters to get him elected.

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

When he was president he had all of that, a beautiful healthcare plan that would cover everyone and an infrastructure plan that strengthen the nation. They were always putting the finishing touches on them and they would be ready in two weeks. For four years. Guy seems to have trouble with finishing touches.

[-] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Maybe he was too busy with other types of touches.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

'Too perfectionist' is his only weakness

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

It's almost 8:00 and I'm certain I'm not gonna hear a better joke today already!

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

in another thread about Vance someone called him a sectional predator.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Well, the least you can say is no-one would have seen that one coming

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 77 points 1 month ago

Republicans being unable to stop themselves from being racist and sexist might well play in Harris' favour here. The vast majority of racists and sexists were going to vote for Trump anyway, but this type of approach and messaging might alienate some moderate undecided voters.

Just hours after she announced her candidacy, Trump’s super PAC released an ad attacking Harris, claiming she “covered up Joe’s obvious mental decline” and that she “knew Joe couldn’t do the job, so she did it” herself.

Is this really the own he thinks it is? By most measures the Biden/Harris term has been fairly successful so giving your opponent credit for the lions share of that work is certainly an interesting strategy. And the coverup is a fairly toothless accusation since Biden actually stepped down in time.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 1 month ago

wait so their attack is saying she is the one really responsible for one of the best presidential terms of my lifetime. bold move cotton.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 14 points 1 month ago

Would be funny to run back the "I approve of this message" counterplay, but I think they have too much respect for Biden to do that.

load more comments (5 replies)

He is deeply misogynistic. He doesn’t understand - and is in fact frightened by - intelligent, incisive, and competent women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Have they tried using the N-word yet? That always works when you have literally nothing else to fall back on.

[-] pezhore@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

I mean, that fox host came real close with "colored" when he referred to one of the historic black fraternities/sororities.

Give it time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

"Show us the birth certificate, cuz she certainly doesn't look American"

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

They already started that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 month ago

There is a strong sense by many in the Democrat Party - namely Barack Hussein Obama - that Kamala Harris is a Marxist fraud who cannot beat President Trump, and they are still holding out for someone "better." Therefore, it would be inappropriate to schedule things with Harris because Democrats very well could still change their minds

Trump’s statement explaining why he refuses to debate says it all. Pathetic.

[-] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Holy shit, Obama's middle name is Hussein!? This changes everything. I'm voting Trump now!

/s

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Born in the deserts of Arrakis

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

who's anyone kidding? GOP will just follow their usual strategy of shouting lies upon lies upon lies while pounding their fists and stomping their feet, and make everyone waste time debunking the bullshit hurricane

at least they have 4 months instead of 4 years

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tough for a convicted criminal to try to be pro-prosecution against a former D.A.

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m honestly surprised they haven’t brought up her Canadian background.

By referencing her Canadian background, they can subtly frame her as being “exotic” and “foreign” and “liberal” in a way that doesn’t sound racist (but which would provably still resonate with racists).

Also, “Canadian Kamala” has good alliteration. I could imagine Trump using it.

Edit: Oh, “Canada Kamala” sounds even better.

[-] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

First of all, please don't give them any ideas.

Second of all, I genuinely think Canadian Kamala might be too long for Trump and his followers. A good alliteration sure, but I could more see him using something simpler like Killer Kamala, after finding (or more honestly making up) a reason to use it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DBT@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The best he has come up with so far is “Lyin’ Kamala Harris” lmao

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
328 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18790 readers
2813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS