42

Get popcorn ready as they investigated themselves and found all that was needed was rule updates.

We taking bets on if future issues like this will be relegated to dms rather than public posts?

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 29 points 2 months ago

Rooki has given up 100’s of hours of his free time to help both Lemmy.World, FHF and the Fediverse as a whole grown in far reaching ways. You don’t immediately fire your staff when they make a bad judgment call.

lol, they're not an employee, they're a just a powertripping internet janitor. I also doubt that being a mod on storm.front has been that instrumental in growing the fediverse.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 months ago

They can't do anything to rooki as they need them for the totally soon sublinks replacement of lemmy.

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

First I've heard of sublinks.

I just checked it out and on the sublinks' site there's a link to a demo that you can view. Not only is it a Lemmy instance but it literally has a link directing people to sign up for Lemmy. You can't make this stuff up.

I vote for federating with demo.sublinks because the opportunities for causing mischief are just too good to pass up.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah the demo is an old clone of world. Entire point of it is to have lemmy without those evil ml devs. because they don't want to work with the devs or learn rust

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

From the sidebar, it looks like they are using lemmy front end and backend is running sublinks which is compatible with lemmy v0.19.3 API.

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

lemmitorqin-shi-huangdi-fireball

might as well say the admin did nothing wrong, also

That being said, using facts to bully others is not in good faith either

loser talk

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 months ago

it's a good learning moment for the admin and team

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 2 months ago

Wait they cracked down on a vegan community for alleged animal abuse? Is that real or parody?

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 months ago
[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

i was always under the impression that this wasn't good for cats, but then again i haven't done any research in like 20 years

[-] Angel@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

The matter of pets on plant-based diets reminds me of the exact energy that the matter of trans women in women's sports has.

Opposition to it is often seen as "basic common sense" on the surface level by people who have not a single idea about the intricacies of the subject, and those who are actually willing to make a case for why such a hasty dismissal isn't as valid as others think it is get scolded and demonized simply for speaking objective, factual claims on the matter.

Cats can survive and thrive on plant-based diets, yes. No animal necessarily needs certain ingredients (such as flesh or plants) more than they need certain nutrients*. Cats need taurine, and humans can include that in plant-based cat food. I wouldn't say that the case in favor of plant-based cats is 100% conclusive, but it sure as hell is leagues more on the "in favor of it" side than what most people vehemently opposed to it are thinking that makes them rebuke positive takes on the matter without question or any degree of openness.

To defend such opposition, people will often say "Cats are obligate carnivores!" without knowing exactly what that means. "Obligate carnivore" is a term in ecology referring to animals that must eat other animals out of survival/nutrition or being unable to digest plants. Domesticated cats who live with human beings and are being fed to them manmade food constructed by the power of human technology don't have this dilemma going on.

It's often immediately painted as "animal abuse," but that's because such a narrative is pushed so hard in a "It's not up for discussion, and we don't need to hear an alternative take on this matter" type of sense.

*Source

Although special attention must be paid to ensure adequate levels of certain nutrients such as proteins, amino acids (e.g., taurine, carnitine, methionine, lysine, and tryptophan), vitamins (e.g., Vitamins A, B3, B9, and B12), minerals (e.g., calcium, iron, zinc, and copper), and certain fats [25], it is important to remember that dogs, cats—and indeed all species—require specific nutrients, rather than specific ingredients. There is—at least in theory—no reason why diets comprised entirely of plants, minerals, and synthetically-based ingredients (i.e., vegan diets) cannot meet the necessary palatability, bioavailability, and nutritional requirements of cats and dogs [25]. Indeed, a growing number of commercially-available diets [26] aim to do so.

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that makes more sense than just digging in and dying on some biological essentialism hill. For me it's just a matter of never really considering it

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago

Same but makes sense if it's just extra vitamins added.

Can't say if the cats would enjoy eating it

[-] Pili@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

Eh, my cat has never enjoyed eating her regular cat food unless I add nooch to it.

So I would just add nooch to her vegan kibbles and I'm sure she'll enjoy them.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Hard to argue that dry kibble is anything like murdering a bird sadistically and slowly for fun and eating a third of it before using the rest as a toy, but mine seem to enjoy kibble just fine so it's probably a moot point if the food is as enjoyable

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That being said, using facts to bully others is not in good faith either.

Ahaha, is this why the lemmylibs think hexbear purely consists of bad faith bullies?? agony

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 months ago

No those are misinformation facts not actual facts

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

Facts are only okay when they agree with my worldview when they don't it's just bullying wojak-nooo

[-] Cyanocobalamin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

Good tegrity. Very adult in the room.

Yeah, you sure did it reddit.world...

[-] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 14 points 2 months ago

In the midst of all this bullshit and frothing hatred you weird little commie gremlins are a breath of fresh air.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

I wonder if any of the lost vegans will end up over here.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Idk, lad, there are some other ones like lemmy.vg and vegantheoryclub.org that they can enter too

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15909 readers
485 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS