this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
113 points (94.5% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2455 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What an absolute knob.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"How would you like a world class military and worse everything else?"

Quite the pitch.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For what it's worth, given Canada's past elections, they would likely tip the scales of the electoral college to consistent blue.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

That was my thought, if Canada came in as the territories are currently divided it wouldn't be good for conservatives in either the house or the Senate.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Ya If Canada was granted multiple states. Otherwise we would be the northern Puerto Rico with no votes

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

And probably lose Alberta for a few years. It would be like brexit- let us back in please

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

Updated for 2024/5:

Jesusland includes Wisconsin, Pennslyvania, Michigan, and Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba.

Illinois, New Mexico and Colorado go to USC, but they're basically in a Lesotho situation.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Tbh Jesusland would also probably try to invade and annex large parts of Mexico for some (completely unnecessary) lebensraum

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Give Canada statehood, buy Greenland, colonize Mars, and do all of these things under the leadership of a bunch of television personalities, the budgetary guidance of a guy who overpaid for Twitter by at least 25 billion and immediately devalued it, and the control of a geriatric, senial moron President. And the dude hasn't even gotten back in office yet. The Onion doesn't even stand a chance for the next 4 years.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Twitter wasn't bought for its economic value but as a propaganda machine and it turned out it was very effective.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Let's not pretend the that was his original intention or that any real forethought was put into it at all. It certainly worked out that way, but that doesn't discount the extreme stupidity, bravado and ineptitude that went into the Twitter purchase. It became a useful propaganda machine because of Elon, but that is different than crediting him for doing so intentionally.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nailed it! Also, didn't the SEC basically force him to buy it after running his mouth off?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. He tried to backpedal his offer.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

It may not have been his plan, but given who funded him it’s not exactly a wild conspiracy.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I personally believe, especially due to the buyer and the backers of the purchase, that the entire intent behind the purchase was to destroy it so that the global elite could better control the narrative. The purchase of Twitter, and the going public of Reddit, both occurred when online networking and support for global protest was in full swing. A lot of those protests have been squashed since, with some help from not being able to easily coordinate and share globally as easily anymore. It worked, now that you’ve caught the car you were chasing, what do you do next? The very next step is to subvert it.

So, yeah. I do believe this was the next step after destroying the ability of the common person to network, protest, and allow progressive ideals to grow.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I believe he just wanted to take control of a popular public forum that had been recently banning (largely) conservative voices for things like dangerous covid misinformation, harassment, violent rhetoric/threats, etc. and he both didn't want to become the next victim of the ban hammer and wanted to return those far right voices and conspiracy theorists back to the forefront. He also clearly wanted to control the narrative about himself too.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey, Donnie, how about granting DC, who actually want it, statehood first? (We all know why not, they vote the wrong way.)

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They have to stop voting against it first.

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

They already voted to become a state, it's in Congress hands now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] justhach@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I tell you what, we'll trade you Alberta and Saskatchewan, the BEEF, OIL, AND GAS POWERHOUSES OF CANADA for your libcucked latte sipping west coast states California, Oregon, and Washington.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's three of our best states. California is one of our biggest economies, has most of our tech sector (Washington being another one) and has a good use of solar energy. Oregon is beautiful.

You can just have Texas and Florida. No trade required.

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's three of our best states

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hpucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

And no, we won't take them back.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, you keep those two

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

No way in hell that we are taking Texas and Florida!

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can't we just form a new country with British Columbia? The four of us are basically the same cultural region.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're roughly describing "Cascadia"

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm well aware. I considered excluding southern California because I'm no fan, but they're not all bad. We can always expel them later if we need to.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's such an American thing to say lol.

No we are very culturally distinct in subtle but important ways. Expats stick out here more than they think, it isn't just about accent or removing your shoes.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have lived in all four west coast states, so I'm pretty familiar. Obviously they're not all the same, but there are a lot of similarities in culture compared to states I have lived in on the east coast.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Proving my point, eh

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Shame we don't have the housing to support mass immigration from blue states.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Our governors are working hard to wall us off from the fascism.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All of it? One state? Strange suggestion.

But I've been saying that the reason Donnie wanted to buy Greenland was so that Putin could connect Russia to the United States and isolate Canada, at which point, Putin would basically control >75% of land and the entire Arctic ocean.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Controlled by Putins cum sock puppet

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The entire US government is now, so...

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

That connects us very minimally east to west.

Greenland connects us across Canada northwards, putting Canada in the middle of Putin controlled land

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

There's a mockumentary about Germany becoming one single canton of Switzerland. Life really does imitate art.

It's called Der grosse Kanton, if anyone's interested.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Quebec isnt going to be happy

[–] EvilZ@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well considering quite a number 500 000 of French Canadians left for the US, I don't believe it would be an issue... There are still a lot of French Canadians American in the US....

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s not even in office yet? Is this even legal?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's absolutely not. See: Logan act.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are we in the Fallout timeline? Gonna annex Canada, and then lose Alaska to China right before the nukes get dropped.

load more comments
view more: next ›