81
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

I started his Stalin book hoping it would be a biography, but it felt like more of a historiography. It was talking about Trosky's criticism of Stalin and Kruschev's de-Stalinization and I wasn't really into it. Not that it seemed like bad history but it wasn't interesting or compelling from what I read.

[-] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

It’s not a biography in any shape or form, that wasn’t Losurdos goal. He specifically criticises how Stalin is portrayed in media and history.

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

yeah I mean its in the sub-title. History and Critique of a Black Legend

[-] WideningGyro@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

It was talking about Trosky's criticism of Stalin and Kruschev's de-Stalinization and I wasn't really into it

I'm not sure I understand why you'd be interested in a book about Stalin but not those things. They are essential for understanding why the picture of Stalin among the western left is so skewed today.

[-] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

I misunderstood the premise of the book. I thought it would be more biographical than historiographical.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13480 readers
933 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS