this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
336 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13533 readers
1268 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greta Tankberg countdown: countdown

Edit: 170 comments doggirl-gloom

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (9 children)

That's now how that works. Please show me some examples of successful revolutions that had 0 ties to those in power.

[–] enkifish@hexbear.net 51 points 1 week ago

Can't get more obvious than the Haitian revolution

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Russian, Cuban, Chinese, Haitian, all were working class revolutions.

[–] Sleve_McDichael@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You’re the one making the assertion so it should be easy for you to point out some examples that support what you’re claiming

[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Examples wouldn't suffice since he's making a claim of non-existence. Proving the contrary is, however, very easy.

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago

You’re clearly the one familiar with the literature. I’m not making a claim. I’m asking for clarification. Surely you can give a single example.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If I remember right, Lenin and Trotsky were both lawyers (but didn't hold office and Lenin was in exile before returning to Russia) and Stalin was a career criminal (he robbed banks on behalf of the revolution) and soldier. Kropotkin didn't partake in the October revolution nor Russian Civil War and was living in exile in France.

My soviet history isn't very good, so others feel free to correct me and call me a dumbass for making shit up. I'd say a significant number of revolutions didn't include anyone with a title or office. The major figures that created the USSR were public employees at best in a place where noblemen still held vast amounts of land and wealth.

I think Mao was from the nobility and renounced his title, but maybe I'm wrong there. I know ~~Che's~~ Castro family owned a plantation.

Edit: brainfart

[–] newacctidk@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Che's family was Argentinian, you are thinking of Fidel. Mao was from a minor landlord family.

However none of these figures had any connections to people in political power. Being born rich is less important in this sense than being a social climber who is friends with some politicians. Fidel for instance had long since alienated all his former ties

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Fixed. I knew that sentence didn't look right lmao

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

lmao classic lib move, pull something straight outta your ass and then expect a detailed response to your baseless argument

I'm sure the Bolsheviks asked a lot of politicians for permission before occupying all strategic points in one night right?

[–] m532@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

As evidently in your other comment, your "in power" there meant "in the government":

All revolutions

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

well stalin robbed the state bank of Georgia ... and he was imprisoned 8 times .. do you mean that connection to the state ?

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

No buddy that is how that works. You're the one who made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.
Or did you mean "not how that works" in that people don't get to push back on the obvious bullshit you've uncritically ingested from the front page of statedeptalkingpoints.com? go back to your echo chamber on reddit-logo