this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15912 readers
472 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i was trying to be tactful, respectful, and understanding by posting this thread for ppl to ask questions abt our beautiful hexbear. i didnt get any questions.

it took 4 hours for Ada, their admin, to respond. she locked the thread shortly after responding her reply above was disheartening, as she seemed willing to work with us previously. equating ableism to a dunk tank post is just vile. and claiming the transphobia in 196 is “a specific event that occurred around a month ago” proves she didnt read any of our concerns. i didnt know abt that event, im sure most of us here dont. our concerns are rooted in the chasers of 196 (non-trans ppl who fetishize trans ppl). someone replied to her saying we were “concern-trolling”. is it that unbelievable that we care abt not having bigotry in the same space as us. i want to grab some of these users by the shoulders, shake them, and yell, “WE ARE BEING GENUINE. WE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT PROVIDING A SAFE, SUPPORTIVE SPACE FOR ALL PEOPLE, AND YOUR COMMUNITY IS ALIENATING TRANS AND DISABLED PEOPLE!!”

responses were not very positive of us

they think this is a bit! lol, lmao even! this whole thing has me jokerfication

this chain of comments particularly upset me “its a troll”. my pronouns are right next to my name, and “it” isnt one of them (even tho thats 100% a valid pronoun to prefer)

this one had me fully jokerfied

and the cherry on top warranted its own post https://hexbear.net/post/373453

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like such a fogey. I'm assuming Vaush is some sort of internet personality? I get search hits for a YouTuber.

[–] ShareThatBread@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

yea

pedo, chaser, racist, imperialism apologist. i could go on

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

yeah, youtuber - "anarcho-Bidenist" with an extremely toxic fanbase and infamous for being a pedo, a chaser, and racist. straight up defends saying the n-word. we normally don't allow discussion of his stuff because giving him attention or brain space is a mistake but it's relevant in the context of the 196 community

[–] absentthereaper@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

straight up defends saying the n-word.

Also chased a Black youtuber(Professor Flowers) off the platform by slandering her as a genocide apologist, and utterly refuses to differentiate between white nationalism, regressive Black nationalism(the kind of horseshit that say, the Black Hebrew Israelites peddle), and actually revolutionary Black nationalism.

[–] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She still makes videos, but yeah that's probably one of the worst things he's done besides threaten to r*pe someone.

I feel so bad for her, not only did she have to deal with all the debatebro fuckery, but apparently she also keeps getting shit from other POC or just other leftists being shitheads in general

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he also did actual sex pest stuff, but that was under his other name before he rebranded to escape the accusations.

[–] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

from my understanding it was all online no? Not that it makes redeemable, but I don't think he's actually physically harassed anyone in person from what we know (wouldn't put it past him of course)

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the incident that made him rebrand was in real life, but I might be confusing him for someone else.

[–] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the person he harassed was Poppy, is that who you're thinking of?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His fucking NATOpedia page never even mentions the incident or that he had any other pseudonym.

Looking at a few sources (including the Destiny sub, please forgive me), it appears that it wasn't in-person but it was multiple victims and he defends his actions

[–] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

see I didn't even know there were multiple, but I did know the he never apologized to Poppy and even threatened her after he gave a non-apology

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Eesh. It's so bizarre to me the online personalities, that people will then claim to be followers of, and even attach a cutesy name to. It's like saying, "Yeah, I'm Savillain. Yeah, I'm a Cosbologist."

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's the commoditization of identity - corporate brands wanted people to identify with them so there was a mass push towards that, especially with advertising. with social media, "influencers" began capitalizing on parasocial relationships with their fandom as well as cultivating brand identity. the post-structuralist critiques are fairly interesting on this front.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just wanna go back to when it took reasonable technical investment to platform on the internet. I had such high hopes for accessibility.

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

capitalism, baybee. takes unmitigated goods and turns them into ash in our mouths.