this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
98 points (96.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13823 readers
766 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope we all know this and are just doing it as a bit, but sometimes I do see shit on this website that makes me go “Oh y’all are genuinely just weird prudes”

The “gooner epidemic” is not real, gooning is an incredibly niche kink that very few people engage in.

“Porn addiction” is basically non existent and affects such a small portion of the population as to not be relevant. The idea that most people have in their heads about porn addiction is propaganda made up by evangelicals.

We do not live in an overly-sexually-liberated time. There is not an excess of sexual content or exposure to it.

Most of the time when people talk about “the gooner problem” what they’re actually talking about is a mix of two unrelated things, people living normal sexually liberated lives, and undersocialized young men that don’t know how to interact with people.

Sex is good. We should be having more of it. We should encourage healthy, safe sex featuring whatever kinks you and your partner(s) consent to. Don’t fall for puritan propaganda comrades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

fedposting "Oh shit, they're onto us! Quick do some damage control! Say you've been a part of the site for years to give you credibility!" "Make sure you claim no responsibility while still pushing the right buttons to ensure they stay divisive!" "Quick, quick, pull out the phrasebook, give a non-commital apology!" "whew! Nailed it. No one will suspect us now."

I'm only joking (or am I?), I just feel like being a bit mean. But this weird liberal politician way of speaking is not healthy. You can commit to a point and stick to your guns, it's ok. Though I am wondering why you thought this wouldn't cause a struggle session if you've been here for years. I've only been here for a couple of years, and your post's inflammatory nature is really obvious. It's clearly designed to treat your position on this as the "passive, neutral, correct" version of things, while accusing anyone who disagrees with you of believing in right wing conspiracies (poisoning the well against them). It seems obvious to me that this would cause a lot of discussion and argument, so I'm wondering what result you expected to get from this?

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

For the record, I do believe them that they are a user who used a different name. I do remember another user who had a very similar name, spoke in a similar manner, and had similar opinions, to the point I actually wondered "Wait, is this just them speaking under an alt" before they even said that.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Or maybe you're just another fed trying to throw me off the trail! Maybe everyone on this site is a fed except me! scared

I think you're right, their post was suspicious, but they've since clarified their intentions. I don't actually think people are feds. I should probably put this as my tagline on my account or something, but:

While I do joke about feds a lot, I don't think there are any real active fed accounts here, there's probably a couple that exist to keep tabs on the website, but I don't think they would bother to actively infiltrate hexbear, the site doesn't really have any ability to organise direct action, and unlike somewhere like reddit, there's not admins that will take the site down for "inciting violence" or whatever. It would be a waste of resources for them to do so.

I should probably reign in this behaviour, even jokingly fedjacketing people can still lead to a culture of suspicion, and there are other ways to call someone out if I disagree with them than calling them a fed.

[–] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect feds, at most, track when people use this website as maybe suspicious?

But I also think they care more about, say, the PSL or the SRA.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, it would just be a note on someone's file. Which is why it's important to practice good OPSEC and not openly talk about any works we do IRL that could trace us.

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Sure I’m currently high enough I’ll try to explain my thoughts through all of that, although most of it is “I’m kinda dumb”

Why I speak like that, I’m not really sure and it’s not something I love about myself but usually how the posts come out here is how the thoughts are going inside, I mask more in other places, here I tend to write how I think.

Why I thought it wouldn’t cause a struggle session, I think I vastly overestimated the degree to which volcel police was a bit, I thought it was just something we were doing because weirdo right wingers were “incels” and someone someday decided that “volcel” was funny.

I don’t generally think of Hexbear as more puritanical than the rest of the Anglo world I think it’s on the more sexually liberated end of things, which is why when in the past I’ve seen things that go against that I go “Oh wait this exists here too.”

So aside from what I thought was a small minority of users I kinda thought I was gonna be preaching to the choir?

I thought discussion of these ideas as right wingers propaganda by a PhD student researching that topic was something people here might appreciate, and then as I was writing the post I got in a weird mode and let the annoying argumentative side out I guess?

I still stand by most of what I’ve said although I could’ve been less of an asshole about some of it. As far as poisoning the well, the point of the video was that these beliefs come from right wing propaganda, so that’s a problem inherent to talking about this, that’s not just me being an asshole in the comments.

In retrospect should I have known this would’ve caused an argument though? 100%

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think it overall would've been fine if you had phrased the post more as "this is what this phd student says about this topic" rather than the way you phrased it originally, which did come across as more confrontational than you probably intended. That way, it would've just been people arguing about tiktok instead of a full on struggle session.

And fair enough on the "I'm kinda dumb" thing, that's why I only make dumb comments, not posts. I would probably end up causing a struggle session over the dumbest shit possible if I did.

And the volcel thing is overdone, but I would much rather be on a site that actively mocks guys creeping on women and gets them to not do that, rather than a site that tolerates or even encourages that behaviour. Though others have already talked about that at length here.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, good luck with your infiltration of hexbear! rat-salute-2

[–] ClimateStalin@hexbear.net 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Genuinely I appreciate the advice, as an autistic person (and federal agent of course) it’s not often enough I get to actually have clear feedback on how I could have done an interaction better rat-salute

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago

Glad I could help! And I'm glad you're taking my jokes with good humour, I wouldn't blame you if you just got mad and hurled insults back at me. I'm very happy we could end up having an actually productive discussion instead of that.

[–] VOLCEL_POLICE@hexbear.net 2 points 6 hours ago

The VOLCEL POLICE are on the scene! PLEASE KEEP YOUR VITAL ESSENCES TO YOURSELVES AT ALL TIMES.

نحن شرطة VolCel.بناءا على تعليمات الهيئة لترويج لألعاب الفيديو و النهي عن الجنس نرجوا الإبتعاد عن أي أفكار جنسية و الحفاظ على حيواناتكم المنويَّة حتى يوم الحساب. اتقوا الله، إنك لا تراه لكنه يراك.

volcel-police