this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
160 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13849 readers
631 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I don't think modern missiles can be intercepted though, no?

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

that's what this program is seeking to change.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

A missile-intercepting missile has to be many times more maneuverable than its target missile...

And if you can make an interceptor that maneuverable, then you can also make a warhead missile with (nearly) the same maneuverability...

I don't see how it's feasible without being 100 years ahead of your adversary in missile technology.

Edit: Unless this tech is real. posadas shrek-blob begone

Edit2: Okay, it's a little more complicated than that, because of the three "missile phases". I see.

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A missile interception scheme doesn't have to work (and it won't, total pipe dream) to ruin MAD, it just has to convince the bloodthirsty maniacs in charge that it works.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)