this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15911 readers
7 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riley@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's this quote doing lying here?

Salient considerations respecting the life of the present Government of Cuba are:

  1. The majority of Cubans support Castro (the lowest estimate I have seen is 50 percent).
  2. There is no effective political opposition.
  3. Fidel Castro and other members of the Cuban Government espouse or condone communist influence.
  4. Communist influence is pervading the Government and the body politic at an amazingly fast rate.
  5. Militant opposition to Castro from without Cuba would only serve his and the communist cause.
  6. The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship.

If the above are accepted or cannot be successfully countered, it follows that every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.

- Lester D. Mallory, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs