this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
289 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
7 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ScrewdriverFactoryFactoryProvider@hexbear.net 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes flattened-bernie

Instead of schools just providing materials for the classrooms, each family has to buy their own kid a dedicated set of supplies. You could pool the supplies and distribute news ones as needed, but if you do this for anything beyond tissues, parents start freaking out because “I bought MY child that SPECIFIC crayon set and it’s not fair that OTHER kids gets to use it because THEIR parents didn’t care enough to get them a special set.”

[–] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Buying school supplies is something I haven't thought about for so long that it never occurred to me that it's unusual or that there's a better way to distribute school supplies.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's even more nuts is that this goes for teachers, too. It's skilled labor, requiring years of college, in demand practically everywhere; yet the pay is shit and part of it has to go to stocking your classroom.

Meanwhile, the school board members just voted themselves each a new, fully-paid SUV.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, the school board members just voted themselves each a new, fully-paid SUV.

Sometimes, the school board just assigns themselves new "recreation centers" on school property that are for themselves only with administrative bowling alleys and the like and just about no one else even gets a chance to look in those very important allocations of scarce resources.

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the fuck? That’s a new one I haven’t heard before. Where I grew up even if the admins skimmed every last cent they could there wasn’t anywhere near enough money going around to build a bowling alley regardless of who was allowed to use it.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

My district fucking sucks and the college I went to had the same problem: telling students that they will have to pay more and get less but then building "administrative centers" on campus that no one goes to but the PMC fucks and it's basically just a place for them to fuck off and look down on everyone else.

I've told this story before but I'll tell it here again and now: one of the most Jokerfying moments I've ever had as a teacher was when my district's newsletter said that there was a budget shortfall and that we all had to tighten our belts and sacrifice and so on... and on the next page there was this big announcement of the poshest high school in the district getting a new stadium... for the same amount as the shortfall. joker-amerikkklap

Honestly, I don’t know how common or uncommon it is elsewhere. It’s just something that’s never made sense to me and the explanation is always a circular, “we don’t have the funding.” Okay, so rebudget. Get more funding. Tell us who’s gatekeeping giving pencils to schoolchildren so we can get give them a fucking swirly. That’s not an answer on it own.

I would have done myself a lot less psychological damage during childhood if I’d understood earlier that, in cases like these, my autism is actually correct. It’s not that I have some deficit in understanding why these things are happening. It’s baseless convention and ritual all the way down.

[–] JuneFall@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only problem with that is if people have other needs. I.e. in terms of different paper or texture feelings etc. However this, too, is easier when you know the standard and can see if that fits you.

Yeah, there would have to be stuff in place to make accommodations for sure. But we already do that for plenty of materials and needs. And currently most differentiation in materials is because parents want to splurge so their kids can have the “nice” things