this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13517 readers
1103 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

You're not banned here*, get in and explain why Yandere Simulator isn't pedophilic. Don't DM me like a coward.

*yet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What was the purpose of coming to the defense of "yandre" though?

Because I’m an adhd idiot that can’t help but info dump.

I'm not sure what defending him accomplishes

You literally just agreed I didn’t.

[–] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have ADHD as well and also know about the yandere subculture and also know not to reflexively jump in to clarify the nuances of the fetish of the man being accused of pedophilia. If I did do that and people called me out on it, I would simply back down and say “I know nothing about the game, so I don’t want to comment further here.” Not to minimize your experiences; sounds like a skill issue though mari-smug

[–] DoiDoi@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

You know, if a lot of people are suddenly piling on you in unison to say that you made a fuck up, you're actually allowed to just say "yeah my bad I'll do better in the future" and no one will continue to make fun of you. This thread is popping right now because with every comment you make that isn't "my bad" your position gets significantly funnier.

[–] Doubledee@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you just incidentally defended "yandre" in this context because you really like informing people that "yandre" isn't always sexual? You're just a normal non- sexual yandre enjoyer who accidentally stumbled into a conversation about a weird pedo game and felt the need to clarify that this um... genre... is not necessarily sexual by default.

Sure I guess. Can you see why in the context of the thread it could be interpreted as a knee jerk defense of the yucky thing being discussed?