this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
69 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
766 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

creator: yeah the thing I dedicate most of my waking hours to? the thing I love more than anything in the world? its just content! its simply media contained between ads, and nothing more! the entire universe revolves around ad revenue and this will never change! poggers!!

me: sadness-abysmal

Death to America

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sloth@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna have a hard time convincing artists of this.

[–] sloth@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

How many paintings did Van Gogh sell?

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So only amatuer art is art? The western art music canon is Schubert and some folk songs? The Sistine chapel and the Forbidden City and the Sphinx, all products

[–] sloth@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can call whatever you want anything you like, especially art. I define 'Art' as something that is created only to exist and be appreciated. Once other concerns and interests get involved it stops being 'Art' and becomes a product with artistic characteristics.

I would consider most folk songs 'Art'.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess...but...that cuts out 99.9998 percent of what most humans would call art. Including all socialist art!

Also, is a commissioned work not created solely to exist and be appreciated by the commissioner (and often the artist as well, artists like making things for others)? Is g&s only art if done by a third rate amateur musical society? Indeed, are they performing art or a product? Does a work of performance art become art when it enters the public domain?

It seems utterly absurd to call every professional artist who ever lived not an artist just because they had some kind of outside context to their work.