249
GUSANO CONFIRMED (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Quoting Mao = reddit tier, got it

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago

Does the word cracker personally offend you?

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

No, and you'll notice that's not at all what I'm talking about.

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

The vast majority of English speakers use "racism" to mean "prejudice or hate based on race," which covers a lot more ground than structural racism. There isn't a great reason to try and redefine racism to exclusively mean structural racism, either, because individual prejudice based on skin color is bad, too.

When people see prejudice based on skin color, the response shouldn't be "whoa whoa whoa, maybe this is OK, depending on who has power here." The response should be that prejudice based on skin color is bad in any situation, but is especially harmful where the group exercising that prejudice has structural power to hurt the target group. Some types of prejudice being worse than others does not mean there is an excusable form of prejudice. It definitely doesn't mean that the less harmful forms aren't prejudice at all.

You think its bad yet you aren't offended by it? How does that make sense? If its bad then you really should find it offensive.

[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hes saying that most people arent going to be super hip on whiteness, white skin and all the difference between terminology and if you call someone whos not already inoculated in that kind of thinking theyre going to just assume youre a weird blue haired college kid racist.

It's a losing battle and especially rings a weird way when its very white people engaging in this kind of rhetoric

Like who are you calling a cracker your parent sent you to a montessori school and you didnt pay for college

[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

It's a losing battle and especially rings a weird way when its very white people engaging in this kind of rhetoric

You are right about one thing, very white people are indeed engaging in this argument. It would not be an argument otherwise.

Like who are you calling a cracker your parent sent you to a montessori school and you didnt pay for college

You should take your own advise and stop engaging in this argument. Especially after posting this. cringe

[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago
[-] Gay_Tomato@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

It never bothers me when someone goes for the cracker/mayo stuff but I literally don't know anyone who's brain is not terminally online that says stuff like this.

[-] Othello@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

are you from the north?

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

No removed ever called me Cracker! - redditor on why they are dodging the 2028 Sino-American war draft

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

Quoting Mao = reddit tier, got it

Cherrypicking Mao so you can keep being mad at people saying cracker is Reddit tier. anti-cracker-aktion farquaad-point

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
249 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
967 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS