this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
195 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
19 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are lots of other galaxy-brain moments there.

"Single payer economies leads to bad things like Bolshevism and Stalin"

@UlyssesT@hexbear.net Let's hear your rant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stigsbandit34z@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I will step in for Ulysses in the mean time :)

Single player economies leads to bad things like Bolshevism and Stalin

It truly fascinates me how these super mega-brained silicon tech geniuses (in all their genius) just can’t seem to reckon with the fact that capitalism has left a trail of blood like no other. But what are the “bad things?” Worker autonomy? Redistribution? Oppressed people taking back power? Can’t you just admit that you’re arguing from a moral framework at this point? Odd how no one ever does. It just has to be the case that anything but capitalism is evil and bad as a consequence of simply challenging existing ideology.

Jesus fuck. Are we really going to pretend like it’s possible to quantify something as a complex as a monopoly? Economics is not a science no matter how hard you try to make it so, and economists will eventually cave to this if you dig deep enough. I think they’re renowned in the STEM world for the pretty remarkable feat of enrolling in graduate-level courses as a high school student, but they are very clearly not objective. How the fuck can you possibly make a claim about the veracity of something leading to a monopoly? As I’ve said on this site before, I’m the furthest thing from a philosopher, but how is that not an absurd claim?

All the proof you need to know that our collective understanding of intelligence means jack shit. I sometimes think “Yeah, I guess since there’s this general trend of certain people taking a test annd answering logically/computationally complex questions with ease, maybe IQ is somewhat valid.”

But then I think back to people like Hawking and Einstein who would’ve unquestionably performed well on those types of tests but had an entirely different worldview. And I really can’t help but think it all comes down to philosophy, namely ethics and what we ought to do as human beings.

These thoughts brought to you by a brain that just finished reading Bullshit Jobs so I would like to thank David Graeber for his help with this post.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yer not using enough emotes nor repeating how detached from reality and deep into their own asses these reptiles are to fill Ulysses void

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've been busy packing and getting ready to ship out in the next few days, and because moving sucks as always, my head's full of bees. All I can do is gesture frantically at what the fuck these servile cheerleaders for billionaires are doing now, though they've been doing the same thing since at least the so-called "Extropian" movement of the early 90s.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is an extropian?

You got decades of lore about these reptiles eh

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is an extropian?

"Extropian" was the 90s era term that capital-R "Rationalists" called themselves back then. The implication was a giant "nuh uh" to mortal limits and human limitations, including entropy itself as the name suggests.

You got decades of lore about these reptiles eh

At a casual outer circle level, I used to be one of them. I used to attend the so-called "futurology" conferences in my local area. I watched them get fully bought out by billionaires and I saw the military-industrial complex set up shop there. yea

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I saw the military-industrial complex set up shop there.

But according to Palo Alto Uber Alles the MIC and Silicon Valley goes back like 50 years

Beat entropy itself

Ah, the Hubris Society

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

But according to Palo Alto Uber Alles the MIC and Silicon Valley goes back like 50 years

I don't doubt that, but it wasn't so brazen as basically military recruitment booths right at the conventions until around the time I was so disgusted that I stopped going. That was also when weird blood orgies involving "chipping" demonstrations right on stage were in vogue. It was like the weird shit you see on the "carousel" on the old Logan's Run.

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 11 months ago

They benefit directly from the system. To question it would mean losing their cushy 6 figure salary where they get to spend all day googling "how do I code this?" and feeling superior to us mere mortals who don't understand the incredible magic of "programming." They have a vested self-interest in defending the status quo, they're modern intelligentsia.