this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
113 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
5 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 11 months ago (5 children)
[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah bro, Lebron literally is proletarian (he may not be at this point due to his wild success, but as a stand in for any other basketball player in those leagues, YES)

Sports dudes will train their entire life to play professionally for a decade, maybe two? And then they have to make that money last the rest of their life because of the damage playing can do to your body. Many couldn't work if they wanted to. It's why the basketball players Union is so important for them, even if it tends to skew towards the top, it gets folks way more money than they otherwise would which can set them and their family for life.

And, respectfully, if you've ever met the kinda guy who owns laundromats, they tend to be fuckin rich dickheads.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn, it's almost as if sports guys make enough money to transition into the bourgeoisie (like Jordan buying restaurants and car dealerships and MiLB teams, licensing his name out etc) or have to work doing something else. soviet-hmm

[–] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Damn, it's almost as if sports guys make enough money to transition into the bourgeoisie

The pay is upper middle class for most players but we only really hear about the handful of super stars that have fat contracts and tens of millions in sponsorship deals. Only a tiny percentage ever make enough to transition out of the working class.

The vast majority ending up with broken bodies and working at a used car dealership the rest of their lives. These men and women were born with bodies that are statistical flukes and not made for a long healthy life due to their exaggerated size. We then ask them to do extreme things with their bodies and push limits that human beings shouldn't be able to cross. This is why players unions that can secure lifetime medical benefits for former players are so critical in professional team sports.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

This is why players unions that can secure lifetime medical benefits for former players are so critical in professional team sports.

Especially for sports like American football, where brain damage is so prevalent.

[–] DanComrd@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The last part of that reply is unironically yes. Or at least Lebron would be a petty bourgeois if we look at his investments and business portfolio.

[–] roux@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

Yeah that comment is a mess. I'm not even a sports guy but a quick search suggests that LeBron James is at least a partial owner of 5 companies. Literally the first link on DDG. Maybe it was prole in the past but he's def part of the owner class now.

[–] i_need_a_non_identifiable_name@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Just prefacing this by saying I am not making a funny ironic post at all, I am dead serious.

Am I wrong in thinking even the highest paid sportsmen are part of the proletariat? They are effectively using their bodies for their employers to generate capital, in some cases having to risk their lives (boxing, rugby, NFL, extreme sports), whilst those employers effectively do nothing but manage the capital these athletes generate and get the majority of the money. Yes many athletes are multimilionairres, but they are the people that make effectivelty most of the money for the multi-billion pound (or dollar or euro) businesses to function.

[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You are not wrong, and they don't really own the means of production. The owners still make the most money if there is money to be had. Any pushback from the players about exhaustion due to ever increasing amount of games is met with cries of overpaid primadonnas.

Players in lower leagues are often exploited financially. Especially if foreign.

[–] Selkie@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

Hard to keep in mind sometimes, but yeah lot of actors and athletes are well off but unless they got their own brands or companies they are still workers

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It gets complicated by the fact the really famous ones get a lot of money from liscencing their likeness and things like that, which is clearly bourgeois, especially when it's for like a 2k game or something and the model being made doesn't need their labor input at all.

But generally we can call them labor aristocrats in the sense that the super rich ones are definitely paid in part out of the labor value of other workers.

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

capitalism doesn't exist because we are still in feudalism. Societal change didn't happen at the throwing of a switch so it didn't happen

[–] shath@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago