57
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15880 readers
434 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Boy dressed as girl is hetero because straight boys can have a little bussy as a treat, as long as it's not argr (NB: getting pegged is not argr if the manlyboy still gets to treat the femboy as a sex object).
Trans girl is gay and you're gay for liking her because gay is when the sussus amogus is subversive to the modes of patriarchal oppression like some kind of soyboy loser (this includes respecting trans people's identities) (patriarchy is predicated on gender essentialism)
So it’s them being cowards and losers got it
What is argr?
Argr is Old Norse for "unmanly". The Norsemen would often have male-on-male sex, where the dominant partner would be seen as manly and the submissive as effeminate, or argr. So if you were accused of being argr, i.e. of being passive in sexual relations with another man, you were literally left with the choice of either killing the accuser, or becoming an outlaw due to being too submissive to take another man's life.
That's how I remember it, at least.
Which, on the whole, is really weird and I kind of wonder how that actually worked in practice.
It would cause a serious drought of bottoms, which doesn't seem ideal for the tops either. Who came up with this system?
Unmanly.
Oh ok. Thanks!
None of those words are in the bible