the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
view the rest of the comments
So...what if ADT decides that instead of paying multiple other companies to deal with this, they just...don't deal with it? They just file a report (or say they did) and continue taking money for "protection" despite doing nothing?
I guess this ancap's response would be "Marie would just switch to a competitor" but what if she's locked into a contract and can't do that? She would be at best blacklisted and unable to hire any security firms due to being "unreliable" and at worst ADT would take the money owed by force. Who would she call to stop the security company? The security company security, who exist to protect people from security company overreach? What if they aren't legit? It would just be security companies all the way down. Or you know, warlords, because that's effectively what this is, just with a sleek corporate logo.