112
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Egon@hexbear.net 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

m not sure that's a good general principle, because otherwise we could for example forgive slavers on the basis that they're finding a way to make ends meet.

wtf-am-i-reading You're comparing sex workers to slaveowners.

I'm not puritanical, I don't have an issue with people engaging in whatever they want to do in that regard provided it isn't harmful or exploitative.

And.

But children are a special category of person, you can't and shouldn't treat them like adults. Teachers are also a special category of person, because they work with children.

You are here contradicting yourself. You are here saying that you do mind what people do even if it isn't harmful or exploitative. You are the only person bringing children into this - the teacher isn't making porn with kids. Teaching and OnlyFans are only connected in the sense that its the same person doing both. You're acting like there's some sort of unholy corruption attached to making OnlyFans that will gradually infect the mind of the teacher and then hurt the children. This is puritanical brainworms.

Certainly I agree about violence too - but then most sports taught at schools trend toward decreasing violence for this reason. Those that don't aren't good. Two bad things don't make a good thing.

Fuck you. This entire response of yours has been you attempting to move the frame of discussion. Piece of shit behaviour. Get better. Blocking you for being a dumbass and a bad debatebro.

[-] Carguacountii@hexbear.net 10 points 7 months ago

Its rather that once something like this comes out, the whole community will know. There's also a potential that children could access whatever pornography is being advertised. I don't think its contradictory - once its public knowledge, it becomes potentially or actually harmful.

Further, I do think that what people do has the potential to affect their mind - how they see things and behave. This is true of soldiers, or abbatoir workers, for example.

Apologies for making you angry, it wasn't intentional.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
763 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS