this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13519 readers
935 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sources on Beau's crimes: https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/sites/dcjs.virginia.gov/files/publications/victims/florida-strategic-plan-human-trafficking.pdf http://justin-king-snitch.blogspot.com/ this one compiles many of the available documentation from the trials/testimonies/etc Sources on Beau's real past which he seems to prefer to keep under wraps: http://justin-king-snitch.blogspot.com/ The same blog from above includes a lot of details https://www.digitaljournal.com/social-media/profile-of-a-digital-journalist-activism-fuels-justin-king/article/398161 interview with him where he contradicts much of his own story especially regarding where he's from Vids from his time in Cincinnati after he was found out in Florida, when he still used his real voice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzaDXYaC-1w https://www.facebook.com/awakenedcincinnatians/videos/2032908463601741/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The lawsuit did not charge some crimes they could have

because they planned on using him as a fake activist snitch

[–] CriticalResist8@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This happened afterwards, e.g. they seized his properties and then gave them back to him for no reason while he was in prison, which happened after sentencing.

Possibly the prosecution was in on it but I think what's more likely is they wanted to stick to the charges they could easily prove in court. This is common in the US from what I understand, and when he was facing 60 years already and is white, they probably didn't care to try and add a smaller charge on top of that.

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

no. watch the video. when a convict has their confiscated properties given back to them, the court usually documents the reason for doing so. Not only is it unusual, but the court kept their reasons for doing so confidential. Making the whole thing far more suspicious than usual.

65 years dialed down to 3.4 years + confiscated property returned for deliberately classified reasons + immediately become a left wing "activist" with opinions suspiciously in line with US foreign policy immediately upon leaving prison = SUPER SUSPICIOUS