137
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13497 readers
835 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Apparently there the answer is to either put the pylons in shallow enough water that big ships physically cannot reach them, or to create artificial reefs around them so that big ships physically cannot reach them. This particular bridge seems to have been uncommonly vulnerable compared to similarly large bridges over shipping lanes, because the closest supports to the channel where big ships can fit were closer together than is normal and they lacked any sort of artificial reef barrier, even though the water depth near them would have allowed barriers to be built.
Yeah that makes a lot of sense. "Just don't get hit" but unironically.