So the computer based solution proposed by Newton and Turing is rejected because the system is chaotic, meaning a general solution will always diverge from reality.

What I don't get is: this should still be good enough Run your solution every month or so, with updated measurements, and you'll have an ongoing "forecast" of conditions.

I'm referencing weather because that's we do. A weather forecast is a prediction of a chaotic system, but of one which changes every day or so. Prediction difficulty is dependent on local conditions and weather type, but we can still make predictions.

A gravitational system of 4 mutually interacting bodies is muuuuuch simpler than weather, and could be predicted far enough in advance to let a civilization adapt and persist!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's neat! The science stuff often just magic to justify the story, but a lot of the ideas are neaalt and it's an easy read. There are some occasional weird moments, but it's also a quick read so not a huge time investment.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

I'm putting it off for the same reason as Iron Council: I'm under a lot of stress right now and don't need to immerse myself in horror and depressive fiction. I haven't even done my Unmasking Autism book club post I wanted to make last week.