Like from what I understand you're not allowed to touch the workers because then it becomes prostitution. So like. A bunch of boys just get together and sit down to watch some girls dancing naked? And they just kinda grin at each other and say "hey isn't it awesome when there's boobs?"

You can't jerk off so they just go to get boners with their buddies? You can do that at home. You can just watch porn with the fellas or have a circlejerk.

I've never understood why it's seen as a straight masculine thing to go to a place where the only thing you can do is get horny with other men.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] garbage@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You said "I'm not a swerf, but". You know the phrase "I'm not racist, but"? And unsurprisingly, you followed it up with a story about stopping this woman from doing sex work, "think I made a positive impact in her life", I don't think it's a leap to say 'yikes' about that.

What are they supposed to do, just not work forever? Permanent strike? People under capitalism unfortunately need money to live, and for the majority of people that means work. Strikes do not stop exploitation, all work under capitalism is exploitative, all bosses under capitalism are stealing surplus value. Having to work as a pre-requisite for housing is exploitation.

Beyond that though, do you think everyone should either strike right this instant until an Employee's Assembly runs every company? Like western governments won't send in strike breakers? and that the alternative is to just be homeless because then your labour isn't being exploited??? I think that's absurd. I got fired last month, fwiw.

also please stop swearing at me.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

gold-communist rat-salute-2