this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13609 readers
720 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
PaX@hexbear.net
61
I don't really like that the feminist stance on cis marriage is that women should keep their own surname rather than taking the man's (hexbear.net)
submitted 7 months ago by ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Why can't it be something fun like swapping surnames and then creating a portmaneau or blended name for the kids.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago

No, children should get all their parents' surnames ad infinitum. My grandkids will have 8 surnames. Their grandkids will have 32.

Say what you want, but this system has the fewest edge cases.

Having names like the ones breeders give to purebred dogs would be hilarious.