117
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 46 points 2 months ago

I need to scream over and over. The Cass Review is not peer reviewed. Scientifically, it's a blog paid for by NHS.

[-] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

It’s had several peer reviewed rebuttals that are damning, however.

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Any chance you have some links handy? I just had an argument with my brother about this issue but didn't have any sources.

[-] windowlicker@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

this critique points out the numerous methodological flaws in the report.

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

heart-sickle Thank you very much!

[-] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

How often do meta analyses get peer review? I was under the impression that it is relatively common for meta analyses to not be peer reviewed because no new studies are being conducted.

[-] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

Feck my effort comment didn't post.

Tldr: meta analysis get peer reviewed like any sort of study.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
854 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS