68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

It is crueler to let them destroy ecosystems they did not evolve in.

And no one (who is a leftist) would argue to kill humans outside of Africa, because we can choose not to be invasive butts. We are because of capitalism. These things are because of instinct. There is no way these can reasonably fit into the system they are introduced to, without massive damage to the local system.

[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I see no reason to value the current ecosystem. It’s completely arbitrary.

If we had tech capable of it, would we be obligated to restore past ecosystems? What if doing so destroyed the current ecosystem? At some point every species alive today displaced another.

What makes the ecosystem as it exists right now especially valuable?

In my view? Unlike ecosystems, animals are actually alive and can suffer. I choose to value their lives over an arbitrary relation of animals at a point in time called an ecosystem.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13441 readers
829 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS